Orit Bart1, Tami Bar-Shalita1, Hanin Mansour1, Reuven Dar2. 1. a Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel. 2. b School of Psychological Sciences , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel.
Abstract
AIM: To explore relationships between sensory responsiveness, anxiety, and ritual behaviors in boys with typical and atypical sensory responsiveness. METHOD: Forty-eight boys, ages 5-9 participated in the study (28 boys with atypical sensory responsiveness and 20 controls). Atypical sensory responsiveness was defined as a score of ≤154 on the Short Sensory Profile. Parents completed the Sensory Profile, the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders, and the Childhood Routines Inventory. RESULTS: Children with atypical sensory responsiveness had significantly higher levels of anxiety and a higher frequency of ritual behaviors than controls. Atypical sensory responsiveness was significantly related to both anxiety and ritual behaviors, with anxiety mediating the relationship between sensory modulation and ritual behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: The findings elucidate the potential consequences of atypical sensory responsiveness and could support the notion that ritual behaviors develop as a coping mechanism in response to anxiety stemming from primary difficulty in modulating sensory input.
AIM: To explore relationships between sensory responsiveness, anxiety, and ritual behaviors in boys with typical and atypical sensory responsiveness. METHOD: Forty-eight boys, ages 5-9 participated in the study (28 boys with atypical sensory responsiveness and 20 controls). Atypical sensory responsiveness was defined as a score of ≤154 on the Short Sensory Profile. Parents completed the Sensory Profile, the Screen for ChildAnxiety Related Emotional Disorders, and the Childhood Routines Inventory. RESULTS:Children with atypical sensory responsiveness had significantly higher levels of anxiety and a higher frequency of ritual behaviors than controls. Atypical sensory responsiveness was significantly related to both anxiety and ritual behaviors, with anxiety mediating the relationship between sensory modulation and ritual behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: The findings elucidate the potential consequences of atypical sensory responsiveness and could support the notion that ritual behaviors develop as a coping mechanism in response to anxiety stemming from primary difficulty in modulating sensory input.
Authors: Kimberly L H Carpenter; Grace T Baranek; William E Copeland; Scott Compton; Nancy Zucker; Geraldine Dawson; Helen L Egger Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2019-06
Authors: Naama Assayag; Itai Berger; Shula Parush; Haim Mell; Tami Bar-Shalita Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 3.390