Literature DB >> 27366870

Detectability of designer benzodiazepines in CEDIA, EMIT II Plus, HEIA, and KIMS II immunochemical screening assays.

Madeleine Pettersson Bergstrand1, Anders Helander1,2, Therese Hansson3, Olof Beck1,2.   

Abstract

The emerging new psychoactive substances made available for recreational drug use have recently started to include designer benzodiazepines. As a consequence, the routine immunoassay drug testing for benzodiazepines may become less effective, due to an increased occurrence of 'false negative' and 'false positive' results. This work aimed to extend the knowledge of analytical cross-reactivity of 13 designer benzodiazepines in the CEDIA, EMIT II Plus, HEIA, and KIMS II immunoassays. Urine standards were prepared by spiking blank urine with clonazolam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, estazolam, etizolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, flutazolam, 3-hydroxyphenazepam, meclonazepam, nifoxipam, phenazepam, and pyrazolam. Authentic urine samples from intoxication cases identified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were also investigated. For the spiked standard samples, the 13 designer benzodiazepines generally showed a high cross-reactivity in all assays. This was further confirmed when investigating their detectability in authentic urine samples from cases of drug intake. The test responses also indicated additional reactivity from metabolites. The lowest detectability in spiked samples was observed for flutazolam, which shows the most divergent chemical structure compared with the other benzodiazepines. Overall, the KIMS II and CEDIA immunoassays, which both include enzymatic hydrolysis of conjugated forms, showed the highest, and EMIT II Plus the lowest degree of reactivity, for spiked parent substances and authentic urine specimens. The results of this study demonstrated that designer benzodiazepines can be detected in standard urine immunoassay drug screening and this should be taken into consideration when performing confirmation analysis.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  designer benzodiazepines; drug testing; immunoassay; new psychoactive substances; urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27366870     DOI: 10.1002/dta.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Test Anal        ISSN: 1942-7603            Impact factor:   3.345


  12 in total

1.  The Psychoactive Surveillance Consortium and Analysis Network (PSCAN): the first year.

Authors:  Andrew A Monte; Andrew Hopkinson; Jessica Saben; Shelby K Shelton; Stephen Thornton; Aaron Schneir; Adam Pomerleau; Robert G Hendrickson; Ann M Arens; Jon B Cole; James Chenoweth; Spencer Martin; Axel Adams; Samuel D Banister; Roy R Gerona
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  Interpol review of toxicology 2016-2019.

Authors:  Wing-Sum Chan; George Fai Wong; Chi-Wai Hung; Yau-Nga Wong; Kit-Mai Fung; Wai-Kit Lee; Kwok-Leung Dao; Chung-Wing Leung; Kam-Moon Lo; Wing-Man Lee; Bobbie Kwok-Keung Cheung
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.

Authors:  Nicole S Jones; Jeffrey H Comparin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2020-05-24

4.  Characterization and identification of eight designer benzodiazepine metabolites by incubation with human liver microsomes and analysis by a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Souleiman El Balkhi; Maxime Chaslot; Nicolas Picard; Sylvain Dulaurent; Martine Delage; Olivier Mathieu; Franck Saint-Marcoux
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 5.  Reports of Adverse Events Associated with Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances, 2017-2020: A Review.

Authors:  Amanda L A Mohr; Barry K Logan; Melissa F Fogarty; Alex J Krotulski; Donna M Papsun; Sherri L Kacinko; Marilyn A Huestis; Jeri D Ropero-Miller
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.220

Review 6.  Metabolites replace the parent drug in the drug arena. The cases of fonazepam and nifoxipam.

Authors:  Maria Katselou; Ioannis Papoutsis; Panagiota Nikolaou; Chara Spiliopoulou; Sotiris Athanaselis
Journal:  Forensic Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Drug trends and harm related to new psychoactive substances (NPS) in Sweden from 2010 to 2016: Experiences from the STRIDA project.

Authors:  Anders Helander; Matilda Bäckberg; Olof Beck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  'New/Designer Benzodiazepines': An Analysis of the Literature and Psychonauts' Trip Reports.

Authors:  Laura Orsolini; John M Corkery; Stefania Chiappini; Amira Guirguis; Alessandro Vento; Domenico De Berardis; Duccio Papanti; Fabrizio Schifano
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 7.363

9.  Comparison of Two Immunoassay Screening Methods and a LC-MS/MS in Detecting Traditional and Designer Benzodiazepines in Urine.

Authors:  Brian Rossi; Francesca Freni; Claudia Vignali; Cristiana Stramesi; Giancarlo Collo; Claudia Carelli; Matteo Moretti; Dario Galatone; Luca Morini
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  A Difficult Challenge for the Clinical Laboratory: Accessing and Interpreting Manufacturer Cross-Reactivity Data for Immunoassays Used in Urine Drug Testing.

Authors:  Justine M Reschly-Krasowski; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.