Literature DB >> 27366463

Anaesthetic Method Preference of Obstetricians for Caesarean Section.

Recai Dağlı1, Selda Songur Dağlı2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anaesthesiologists are applying regional anaesthesia for caesarean section at an increasing rate compared to previous years. In our study, we tried to evaluate the perspective of obstetricians towards this trend.
METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to e-mail addresses of obstetricians via the internet; 195 obstetricians replied. Sex, age, work place, employer, working durations as consultant, preference of anaesthesia for caesarean section and their bias towards regional anaesthesia were asked with these questionnaires. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate their bias towards regional anaesthesia.
RESULTS: While 82.1% of obstetricians (n: 160) preferred regional anaesthesia, 17.9% of obstetricians (n: 35) favoured general anaesthesia for caesarean section for both themselves and their primary relatives. However, 80% of the participants opted for regional anaesthesia for their patients; only 20% of the participants still preferred general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Chi-square tests that were used to evaluate the relationship between demographic data and anaesthesia choices of obstetricians for both themselves, their primary relatives and their patients did not reveal any statistically significant differences (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: A large portion of Turkish obstetricians consider regional anaesthesia a safe procedure and prefer it highly for both themselves and their patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section anaesthesia; preference of anaesthesia; regional anaesthesia

Year:  2014        PMID: 27366463      PMCID: PMC4917124          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.03521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  4 in total

1.  Failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a 6-year review in a UK region.

Authors:  P D Barnardo; J G Jenkins
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Effect of type of anesthesia on blood loss at elective repeat cesarean section.

Authors:  W W Andrews; S M Ramin; M C Maberry; V Shearer; S Black; D H Wallace
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990.

Authors:  J L Hawkins; L M Koonin; S K Palmer; C P Gibbs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: incidence, risk factors, and mortality.

Authors:  Andra H James; Margaret G Jamison; Leo R Brancazio; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 8.661

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Is spinal anesthesia an alternative and feasible method for proximal ureteral stone treatment?

Authors:  Ramazan Topaktaş; Selçuk Altin; Cemil Aydin; Ali Akkoç; Ahmet Ürkmez; Zeynep Banu Aydin
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-06-15

2.  Evaluation of the attitudes of surgeons about regional anesthesia: a survey study.

Authors:  Ferda Yılmaz İnal; Yadigar Yılmaz; Hayrettin Daşkaya; Mehmet Toptaş; Hasan Koçoğlu; Harun Uysal; İbrahim Akkoç
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2019-09-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.