Literature DB >> 27366216

Cost-effectiveness analysis of rifaximin-α administration for the reduction of episodes of overt hepatic encephalopathy in recurrence compared with standard treatment in France.

Anastasiia Kabeshova1, Soumaia Ben Hariz1, Elyonore Tsakeu1, Robert Benamouzig2, Robert Launois3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome that occurs most often in a context of acute or chronic liver disease. Despite the seriousness of the pathology, only a few treatments have been developed for improving its management. Rifaximin-α is the first treatment that has been clinically developed for overt HE (OHE) episodes. Recent results of clinical studies demonstrated its significant improvement in the health-related quality of life. The objective of the current study was to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of rifaximin-α used in combination with lactulose compared with lactulose monotherapy in cirrhotic patients, who have experienced at least two prior OHE events.
METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate rifaximin-α cost-effectiveness, evaluating it from the perspective of all contributors as recommended by French health technology assessment guidelines. Costs were based on current French treatment practices. The transition between health states was based on the reanalysis of the rifaximin-α pivotal clinical trials RFHE3001 and RFHE3002. The main outcome of the model was cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY).
RESULTS: The results indicate that rifaximin-α is a cost-effective treatment option with an incremental cost per QALY gained of €19,187 and €18,517 over two different time horizons (2 and 5 years). The robustness of the model was studied using probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSION: For the societal willingness to pay threshold of €27,000 per QALY gained, rifaximin-α in combination with lactulose is a cost-effective and affordable treatment for patients who have experienced at least two prior overt HE episodes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov chains; cost–benefit analysis; hepatic encephalopathy; lactulose; rifaximin

Year:  2016        PMID: 27366216      PMCID: PMC4913340          DOI: 10.1177/1756283X16644249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1756-283X            Impact factor:   4.409


  16 in total

1.  Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Andrew H Briggs; Ron Goeree; Gord Blackhouse; Bernie J O'Brien
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Rifaximin treatment in hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Nathan M Bass; Kevin D Mullen; Arun Sanyal; Fred Poordad; Guy Neff; Carroll B Leevy; Samuel Sigal; Muhammad Y Sheikh; Kimberly Beavers; Todd Frederick; Lewis Teperman; Donald Hillebrand; Shirley Huang; Kunal Merchant; Audrey Shaw; Enoch Bortey; William P Forbes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Analysis of hospitalizations comparing rifaximin versus lactulose in the management of hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  G W Neff; N Kemmer; V C Zacharias; T Kaiser; C Duncan; R McHenry; M Jonas; D Novick; C Williamson; K Hess; M Thomas; J Buell
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 4.  Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 practice guideline by the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  Comparison of rifaximin and lactulose for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Yong Han Paik; Kwan Sik Lee; Kwang Hyub Han; Kun Hoon Song; Myoung Hwan Kim; Byung Soo Moon; Sang Hoon Ahn; Se Joon Lee; Hyo Jin Park; Dong Ki Lee; Chae Yoon Chon; Sang In Lee; Young Myoung Moon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Efficacy of rifaximin versus lactulose for reducing the recurrence of overt hepatic encephalopathy and hopitalizations in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Roxana Irimia; Anca Trifan
Journal:  Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

7.  The cost-effectiveness and budget impact of competing therapies in hepatic encephalopathy - a decision analysis.

Authors:  E Huang; E Esrailian; B M R Spiegel
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing rifaximin plus lactulose with lactulose alone in treatment of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Barjesh Chander Sharma; Praveen Sharma; Manish Kumar Lunia; Siddharth Srivastava; Rohit Goyal; S K Sarin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Hospitalizations during the use of rifaximin versus lactulose for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Carroll B Leevy; James A Phillips
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Hepatic Encephalopathy: An Update on the Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Options.

Authors:  Saleh Elwir; Robert S Rahimi
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2017-05-04

2.  Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy and Pharmacoeconomic Impact of Rifaximin.

Authors:  Guy Neff; Woodie Zachry
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Economic impact of the use of rifaximin 550 mg twice daily for the treatment of overt hepatic encephalopathy in Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Paola Roggeri; Alessandro Roggeri
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2017-09-25

Review 4.  Recent advances in hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Victoria Liere; Gurkarminder Sandhu; Sharon DeMorrow
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-09-04

Review 5.  Current and future pharmacological therapies for managing cirrhosis and its complications.

Authors:  David Kockerling; Rooshi Nathwani; Roberta Forlano; Pinelopi Manousou; Benjamin H Mullish; Ameet Dhar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.