| Literature DB >> 27365942 |
Apurva Mishra1, Ramesh K Pandey2.
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) in Indian children and to analyze the possible etiological factors.Entities:
Keywords: Enamel opacities; Molar incisal hypomineraliza-tion; Posteruptive breakdown; Prenatal and postnatal infections.
Year: 2016 PMID: 27365942 PMCID: PMC4921890 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Table 1: Distribution of study population by gender, place of birth, and type of delivery
| Age in years, mean ± SD | 10.25 ± 1.25 | ||||
| Male | 92 | 48.2 | |||
| Female | 99 | 51.8 | |||
| Rural | 92 | 48.2 | |||
| Urban | 99 | 51.8 | |||
| Normal | 112 | 58.6 | |||
| Cesarean | 79 | 41.4 |
SD: Standard deviation
Graph 1Age and gender distribution of children
Table 2: Distribution of clinical symptoms with gender
| % | |||||||||||||||
| Chicken pox | 15 | 7.9 | 7 | 7.6 | 8 | 8.1 | 0.96 (0.55-1.69), 0.90 | ||||||||
| Jaundice | 12 | 6.3 | 7 | 7.6 | 5 | 5.1 | 1.22 (0.74-2.03), 0.46 | ||||||||
| Cardiac problem | 8 | 4.2 | 3 | 3.3 | 5 | 5.1 | 0.77 (0.31-1.91), 0.53 | ||||||||
| Kidney problem | 5 | 2.6 | 1 | 1.1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0.40 (0.07-2.37), 0.20 | ||||||||
| Ear infection | 9 | 4.7 | 7 | 7.6 | 2 | 2.0 | 1.66 (1.13-2.44), 0.04* | ||||||||
| Vitamin A deficiency | 16 | 8.4 | 11 | 12.0 | 5 | 5.1 | 1.48 (1.02-2.14), 0.03* | ||||||||
| Chest infection | 7 | 3.7 | 3 | 3.3 | 4 | 4.0 | 0.88 (0.37-2.11), 0.77 | ||||||||
| High fever | 19 | 9.9 | 10 | 10.9 | 9 | 9.1 | 1.10 (0.70-1.73), 0.68 | ||||||||
| Intake of antibiotics | 22 | 11.5 | 11 | 12.0 | 11 | 11.1 | 1.04 (0.66-1.63), 0.85 | ||||||||
| Long-term breastfeeding | 12 | 6.3 | 3 | 3.3 | 9 | 9.1 | 0.50 (0.18-1.35), 0.09 | ||||||||
RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval; *Significant
Table 3: Distribution of affected molars and incisor with molar incisor hypomineralization by gender
| Molars | 126 | 66.0 | 65 | 70.7 | 61 | 61.6 | 1.24 (0.88-1.73), 0.18 | ||||||||
| Incisor with molar | 53 | 27.7 | 16 | 17.4 | 37 | 37.4 | 0.54 (0.35-0.84), 0.002* | ||||||||
| Incisor with opacity | 12 | 6.3 | 11 | 12.0 | 1 | 1.0 | 2.02 (1.60-2.56), 0.002* | ||||||||
RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval; *Significant
Table 4: Distribution of number of first molars affected with molar incisor hypomineralization by gender
| Single molar | 72 | 37.7 | 34 | 37.0 | 38 | 38.4 | 0.96 (0.71-1.31), 0.83 | ||||||||
| Two molars | 53 | 27.7 | 23 | 25.0 | 30 | 30.3 | 0.86 (0.61-1.23), 0.41 | ||||||||
| Three molars | 40 | 20.9 | 16 | 17.4 | 24 | 24.2 | 0.79 (0.52-1.19), 0.24 | ||||||||
| Four molars | 14 | 7.3 | 7 | 7.6 | 7 | 7.1 | 1.04 (0.60-1.79), 0.88 | ||||||||
RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval
Table 5: Distribution of affected molars and incisors with type of delivery
| Molars | 75 | 67.0 | 51 | 64.6 | 1.04 (0.81-1.35), 0.72 | ||||||
| Incisor with | 31 | 27.7 | 22 | 27.8 | 0.99 (0.76-1.30), 0.97 | ||||||
| Incisor with | 6 | 5.4 | 6 | 7.6 | 0.84 (0.47-1.50), 0.53 | ||||||
RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval
Table 6: Distribution of number of affected first molars with type of delivery
| Single molar | 48 | 42.9 | 24 | 30.4 | 1.24 (0.98-1.56), 0.08 | ||||||
| Two molars | 27 | 24.1 | 26 | 32.9 | 0.82 (0.61-1.11), 0.18 | ||||||
| Three molars | 24 | 21.4 | 16 | 20.3 | 1.03 (0.77-1.37), 0.84 | ||||||
| Four molars | 7 | 6.2 | 7 | 8.9 | 0.84 (0.49-1.44), 0.49 | ||||||
Table 7: Studies reporting prevalence of MIH around the world
| Sweden | Koch et al 1987 | 2,226 | 4-15 | ||||
| Finland | Alaluusua et al 1996 | 102 | 17 | ||||
| Switzerland | Clavadetscher 1997 | 1,671 | 6.4 | ||||
| Turkey | Alpoz and Ertugrul | 250 | 14.8 | ||||
| 1999 | |||||||
| Sweden | Jalveik et al 2001 | 516 | 18 | ||||
| Finland | Leppaniemi et al 2001 | 488 | 19 | ||||
| The Netherlands | Weeheijm et al 2001 | 497 | 10 | ||||
| UK | Zagdwon et al 2002 | 307 | 14.6 | ||||
| Germany | Dietric et al 2003 | 2,408 | 6 | ||||
| Denmark | Esmark et al 2003; | 5,277 | 15-25 | ||||
| Weerheijim et al 2003 | |||||||
| Greece | Lygidakis et al 2004 | 2,640 | 6 | ||||
| Slovenia | Kosem et al 2004 | 2,339 | 14 | ||||
| Italy | Calderara et al 2005 | 227 | 13.7 | ||||
| Germany | Preusser 2006 | 1,022 | 5.9 | ||||
| Libya | Fteita et al 2006 | 378 | 2.9 | ||||
| Lithuania | Jasulaityto et al 2007 | 1,277 | 9.7 | ||||
| Bosnia | Muratbegovic et al | 560 | 12.3 | ||||
| 2007 | |||||||
| Kenya | Kemoli 2008 | 3,591 | 13.73 | ||||
| Hong Kong | Cho et al 2008 | 2,635 | 2.8 | ||||
| Bulgaria | Kukleva et al 2008 | 2,960 | 3.58 | ||||
| Istanbul | Kusku et al 2008 | 147 | 14.9 | ||||
| Wainuiomata | Mahoney et al 2009 | 522 | 14.9 | ||||
| Jordon | Zawaideh et al 2011 | 3,666 | 17.6 | ||||
| Argentina | Biondi et al 2011 | 1,098 | 15.9 | ||||
| India | Present study | 1,369 | 13.9 |
MIH: Molar incisor hypomineralization