Literature DB >> 27365540

Diagnosis of Endometrial-Factor Infertility: Current Approaches and New Avenues for Research.

N Katzorke1, F Vilella2, M Ruiz2, J-S Krüssel3, C Simón4.   

Abstract

Over the last decade, research to improve success rates in reproductive medicine has focused predominantly on the understanding and optimization of embryo quality. However, the emergence of personalized medicine in ovulation induction and embryology has shifted the focus to assessing the individual status of the endometrium. The endometrium is considered receptive during an individually defined period, the window of implantation (WOI), when the mother permits a blastocyst to attach and implant. This individual receptivity status can now be objectively diagnosed using the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) developed in 2011. The ERA, together with a computational algorithm, detects the unique transcriptomic signature of endometrial receptivity by analyzing 238 differentially expressed genes and reliably predicting the WOI. We and others have illustrated the utility of this personalized diagnostic approach to discriminate between individual physiological variation in endometrial receptivity and unknown endometrial pathology, deemed as causal in recurrent implantation failure (RIF). An international randomized controlled trial ("The ERA as a diagnostic guide for personalized embryo transfer." ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01954758) is underway to determine the clinical value of this endometrial diagnostic intervention in the work-up for reproductive care. In this review, we analyse the current clinical practice in the diagnosis of the endometrial factor together with new avenues of research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproduction; endometrial receptivity array (ERA); implantation failure; microRNA; window of implantation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27365540      PMCID: PMC4922892          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-103752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  45 in total

1.  Error in histologic dating of secretory endometrium: variance component analysis.

Authors:  M Gibson; G J Badger; F Byrn; K R Lee; R Korson; T D Trainer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects.

Authors:  R T Scott; R R Snyder; D M Strickland; C C Tyburski; J A Bagnall; K R Reed; C A Adair; S B Hensley
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Relationships between the luteinizing hormone surge and other characteristics of the menstrual cycle in normally ovulating women.

Authors:  Ana Direito; Sébastien Bailly; Aude Mariani; René Ecochard
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Human embryos secrete microRNAs into culture media--a potential biomarker for implantation.

Authors:  Evan M Rosenbluth; Dawne N Shelton; Lindsay M Wells; Amy E T Sparks; Bradley J Van Voorhis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs.

Authors:  Lee P Lim; Nelson C Lau; Philip Garrett-Engele; Andrew Grimson; Janell M Schelter; John Castle; David P Bartel; Peter S Linsley; Jason M Johnson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Endometrial gene expression analysis at the time of embryo implantation in women with unexplained infertility.

Authors:  S Altmäe; J A Martínez-Conejero; A Salumets; C Simón; J A Horcajadas; A Stavreus-Evers
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  The usefulness of endometrial biopsy for luteal phase evaluation in infertility.

Authors:  J Balasch; F Fábregues; M Creus; J A Vanrell
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure.

Authors:  Maria Ruiz-Alonso; David Blesa; Patricia Díaz-Gimeno; Eva Gómez; Manuel Fernández-Sánchez; Francisco Carranza; Joan Carrera; Felip Vilella; Antonio Pellicer; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Human pre-implantation embryo development.

Authors:  Kathy K Niakan; Jinnuo Han; Roger A Pedersen; Carlos Simon; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Genomic instability influences the transcriptome and proteome in endometrial cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Jens K Habermann; Nana K Bündgen; Timo Gemoll; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Caroline Lundgren; Danny Wangsa; Jana Doering; Hans-Peter Bruch; Britta Nordstroem; Uwe J Roblick; Hans Jörnvall; Gert Auer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  7 in total

1.  Live birth after transfer of a single euploid vitrified-warmed blastocyst according to standard timing vs. timing as recommended by endometrial receptivity analysis.

Authors:  Nicole Doyle; Joshua C Combs; Samad Jahandideh; Victoria Wilkinson; Kate Devine; Jeanne E O'Brien
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 7.490

2.  Evaluation of the effect of intrauterine injection of platelet-rich plasma on the pregnancy rate of patients with a history of implantation failure in the in vitro fertilization cycle.

Authors:  Sara Ershadi; Narjes Noori; Alireza Dashipoor; Marzieh Ghasemi; Nahid Shamsa
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-05-14

3.  Effect of the time for embryo transfer from oocyte retrieval on clinical outcomes in freeze-all cycles: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shiping Chen; Yachao Yao; Yang Luo; Yuling Mao; Hanyan Liu; Hongzi Du; Xiangjin Kang; Lei Li
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma on implantation and pregnancy in repeated implantation failure: A pilot study.

Authors:  Leila Nazari; Saghar Salehpour; Sedighe Hoseini; Shahrzad Zadehmodarres; Ladan Ajori
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-10

5.  MAML1: a coregulator that alters endometrial epithelial cell adhesive capacity.

Authors:  Sadaf Zafir; Wei Zhou; Ellen Menkhorst; Leilani Santos; Evdokia Dimitriadis
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2021-03-27

6.  A 3D endometrial organotypic model simulating the acute inflammatory decidualisation initiation phase with epithelial induction of the key endometrial receptivity marker, integrin αVβ3.

Authors:  R Fraser; R Smith; C-J Lin
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-08-25

Review 7.  Role of endometrial microRNAs in repeated implantation failure (mini-review).

Authors:  Sepide Goharitaban; Ali Abedelahi; Kobra Hamdi; Mozafar Khazaei; Masoumeh Esmaeilivand; Behrooz Niknafs
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-08-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.