Literature DB >> 27365477

Infection in total elbow arthroplasty with stable components: outcomes of a staged surgical protocol with retention of the components.

P N Streubel1, J P Simone2, B F Morrey3, J Sanchez-Sotelo3, M E Morrey3.   

Abstract

AIMS: We describe the use of a protocol of irrigation and debridement (I&D) with retention of the implant for the treatment of periprosthetic infection of a total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). This may be an attractive alternative to staged re-implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 2010, 23 consecutive patients were treated in this way. Three were lost to follow-up leaving 20 patients (21 TEAs) in the study. There were six men and 14 women. Their mean age was 58 years (23 to 76). The protocol involved: component unlinking, irrigation and debridement (I&D), and the introduction of antibiotic laden cement beads; organism-specific intravenous antibiotics; repeat I&D and re-linkage of the implant if appropriate; long-term oral antibiotic therapy.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 7.1 years (2 to 16). The infecting micro-organisms were Staphylococcus aureus in nine, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 13, Corynebacterium in three and other in six cases. Re-operations included three repeat staged I&Ds, two repeat superficial I&Ds and one fasciocutaneous forearm flap. One patient required removal of the implant due to persistent infection. All except three patients rated their pain as absent or mild. Outcome was rated as good or excellent in 15 patients (mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score 78 points, (5 to 100) with a mean flexion-extension arc of 103° (40° to 150°)).
CONCLUSION: A staged protocol can be successful in retaining stable components of an infected TEA. Function of the elbow may compare unfavourably to that after an uncomplicated TEA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:976-83. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Component retention; Infection; Total elbow arthroplasty; Two-stage re-implantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27365477     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B7.36397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Elbow prostheses in rheumatic diseases].

Authors:  V Rausch; M Hackl; T Leschinger; L P Müller; K Wegmann
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  Scoping review: Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection in elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  A C Watts; A D Duckworth; I A Trail; J Rees; M Thomas; A Rangan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-07-27

3.  Fungal Infection following Total Elbow Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Samuel S Ornell; Khang H Dang; Aaron J Bois; Anil K Dutta
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 4.  Revision total elbow replacement.

Authors:  Kuen Chin; Simon Lambert
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-07-03

Review 5.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.