BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) is recommended as a first-line agent for induction therapy in renal transplantation. However, this remains controversial in deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) maintained on tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) with or without steroids. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We studied the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry for patients receiving DDRT from 2000 to 2012 maintained on TAC/MPA at transplantation hospital discharge (n=74,627) to compare outcomes of IL2-RA and other induction agents. We initially divided the cohort into two groups on the basis of steroid use at the time of discharge: steroid (n=59,010) versus no steroid (n=15,617). Each group was stratified into induction categories: IL2-RA, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG), alemtuzumab, and no induction. The main outcomes were incidence of acute rejection within the first year and overall graft failure (defined as graft failure and/or death) post-transplantation. Propensity score (PS), specifically inverse probability of treatment weight, analysis was used to minimize selection bias caused by nonrandom assignment of induction therapies. RESULTS: Median (25th, 75th percentiles) follow-up times were 3.9 (1.1, 5.9) and 3.2 (1.1, 4.9) years for steroid and no steroid groups, respectively. Acute rejection within the first year and overall graft failure within 5 years of transplantation were more common in the no induction category (13.3%; P<0.001 and 28%; P=0.01, respectively) in the steroid group and the IL2-RA category (11.1%; P=0.16 and 27.4%; P<0.001, respectively) in the no steroid group. Compared with IL2-RA, PS-weighted and covariate-adjusted multivariable logistic and Cox analyses showed that outcomes in the steroid group were similar among induction categories, except that acute rejection was significantly lower with r-ATG (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62 to 0.74). In the no steroid group, compared with IL2-RA, odds of acute rejection with r-ATG (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.00) and alemtuzumab (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.88) were lower, and r-ATG was associated with better graft survival (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In DDRT, compared with IL2-RA induction, no induction was associated with similar outcomes when TAC/MPA/steroids were used. r-ATG seems to offer better graft survival over IL2-RA in steroid avoidance protocols.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) is recommended as a first-line agent for induction therapy in renal transplantation. However, this remains controversial in deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) maintained on tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) with or without steroids. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We studied the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry for patients receiving DDRT from 2000 to 2012 maintained on TAC/MPA at transplantation hospital discharge (n=74,627) to compare outcomes of IL2-RA and other induction agents. We initially divided the cohort into two groups on the basis of steroid use at the time of discharge: steroid (n=59,010) versus no steroid (n=15,617). Each group was stratified into induction categories: IL2-RA, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG), alemtuzumab, and no induction. The main outcomes were incidence of acute rejection within the first year and overall graft failure (defined as graft failure and/or death) post-transplantation. Propensity score (PS), specifically inverse probability of treatment weight, analysis was used to minimize selection bias caused by nonrandom assignment of induction therapies. RESULTS: Median (25th, 75th percentiles) follow-up times were 3.9 (1.1, 5.9) and 3.2 (1.1, 4.9) years for steroid and no steroid groups, respectively. Acute rejection within the first year and overall graft failure within 5 years of transplantation were more common in the no induction category (13.3%; P<0.001 and 28%; P=0.01, respectively) in the steroid group and the IL2-RA category (11.1%; P=0.16 and 27.4%; P<0.001, respectively) in the no steroid group. Compared with IL2-RA, PS-weighted and covariate-adjusted multivariable logistic and Cox analyses showed that outcomes in the steroid group were similar among induction categories, except that acute rejection was significantly lower with r-ATG (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62 to 0.74). In the no steroid group, compared with IL2-RA, odds of acute rejection with r-ATG (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.00) and alemtuzumab (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.88) were lower, and r-ATG was associated with better graft survival (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In DDRT, compared with IL2-RA induction, no induction was associated with similar outcomes when TAC/MPA/steroids were used. r-ATG seems to offer better graft survival over IL2-RA in steroid avoidance protocols.
Authors: Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-12-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: N Ahsan; D Hricik; A Matas; S Rose; S Tomlanovich; A Wilkinson; M Ewell; M McIntosh; D Stablein; E Hodge Journal: Transplantation Date: 1999-12-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: R Hellemans; M Hazzan; D Durand; G Mourad; P Lang; M Kessler; B Charpentier; G Touchard; F Berthoux; P Merville; N Ouali; J-P Squifflet; F Bayle; K M Wissing; C Noël; D Abramowicz Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: E Steve Woodle; Flavio Vincenti; Marc I Lorber; H Albin Gritsch; Donald Hricik; Kenneth Washburn; Arthur J Matas; Michael Gallichio; John Neylan Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: H Lilliu; C Brun-Strang; C Le Pen; M Büchler; A Al Najjar; G Priol; O Reigneau; Y Lebranchu Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Nasimul Ahsan; Michael J Holman; Mark V Jarowenko; Mohammad S Razzaque; Harold C Yang Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Rhys D R Evans; James H Lan; Matthew Kadatz; Sandeep Brar; Doris T Chang; Lachlan McMichael; Jagbir Gill; John S Gill Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 10.614
Authors: Vikas R Dharnidharka; Abhijit S Naik; David A Axelrod; Mark A Schnitzler; Zidong Zhang; Sunjae Bae; Dorry L Segev; Daniel C Brennan; Tarek Alhamad; Rosemary Ouseph; Ngan N Lam; Mustafa Nazzal; Henry Randall; Bertram L Kasiske; Mara McAdams-Demarco; Krista L Lentine Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Meghan E Sise; David S Goldberg; Jens J Kort; Douglas E Schaubel; Rita R Alloway; Christine M Durand; Robert J Fontana; Robert S Brown; John J Friedewald; Stacey Prenner; J Richard Landis; Melissa Fernando; Caitlin C Phillips; E Steve Woodle; Adele Rike-Shields; Kenneth E Sherman; Nahel Elias; Winfred W Williams; Jenna L Gustafson; Niraj M Desai; Brittany Barnaba; Silas P Norman; Mona Doshi; Samuel T Sultan; Meredith J Aull; Josh Levitsky; Dianne S Belshe; Raymond T Chung; Peter P Reese Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: James H Lan; Matthew Kadatz; Doris T Chang; Jagbir Gill; Howard M Gebel; John S Gill Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Maria Cappuccilli; Gabriele Donati; Giorgia Comai; Olga Baraldi; Diletta Conte; Irene Capelli; Valeria Aiello; Andrea Pession; Gaetano La Manna Journal: J Inflamm Res Date: 2017-05-03
Authors: Ilaria Gandolfini; Cynthia Harris; Michael Abecassis; Lisa Anderson; Oriol Bestard; Giorgia Comai; Paolo Cravedi; Elena Cremaschi; J Andrew Duty; Sander Florman; John Friedewald; Gaetano La Manna; Umberto Maggiore; Thomas Moran; Giovanni Piotti; Carolina Purroy; Marta Jarque; Vinay Nair; Ron Shapiro; Jessica Reid-Adam; Peter S Heeger Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2017-06-21