BACKGROUND: To improve the consistency of standardized Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessments, an electronic data capture tool and analysis tool was developed, Neurostatus e-Scoring (NESC). This tool allows real-time feedback by comparing entries with established scoring rules. OBJECTIVE: To test whether using NESC reduces inconsistencies as compared to the paper-and-pencil version of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (pEDSS). METHODS: In all, 100 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were assessed in random order on the same day by pairs of neurologists, one using pEDSS and one NESC. We compared inter-rater reliability and frequency of inconsistencies in Neurostatus subscores, functional system (FS) scores, ambulation and EDSS steps. RESULTS: Inconsistencies of any type were more likely to occur when using pEDSS (mean odds ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 2.93 (1.62; 5.29)). This was also the case for FS score inconsistencies (2.54 (1.40; 4.61)) and more likely for patients in the lower EDSS range (⩽3.5 vs >3.5) (5.32 (1.19; 23.77)). Overall, inter-rater agreement for the assessed Neurostatus subscores was high (median and inter-quartile range = 0.84 (0.73, 0.81)). CONCLUSION: Our data provide class II evidence that the use of NESC increases consistency of standardized EDSS assessments, and may thus have the potential to decrease noise and increase power of MS clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: To improve the consistency of standardized Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessments, an electronic data capture tool and analysis tool was developed, Neurostatus e-Scoring (NESC). This tool allows real-time feedback by comparing entries with established scoring rules. OBJECTIVE: To test whether using NESC reduces inconsistencies as compared to the paper-and-pencil version of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (pEDSS). METHODS: In all, 100 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were assessed in random order on the same day by pairs of neurologists, one using pEDSS and one NESC. We compared inter-rater reliability and frequency of inconsistencies in Neurostatus subscores, functional system (FS) scores, ambulation and EDSS steps. RESULTS: Inconsistencies of any type were more likely to occur when using pEDSS (mean odds ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 2.93 (1.62; 5.29)). This was also the case for FS score inconsistencies (2.54 (1.40; 4.61)) and more likely for patients in the lower EDSS range (⩽3.5 vs >3.5) (5.32 (1.19; 23.77)). Overall, inter-rater agreement for the assessed Neurostatus subscores was high (median and inter-quartile range = 0.84 (0.73, 0.81)). CONCLUSION: Our data provide class II evidence that the use of NESC increases consistency of standardized EDSS assessments, and may thus have the potential to decrease noise and increase power of MS clinical trials.
Authors: Marcus W Koch; Jop P Mostert; Jerry S Wolinsky; Fred D Lublin; Bernard Uitdehaag; Gary R Cutter Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Wouter J C van Ballegoij; Stephanie I W van de Stadt; Irene C Huffnagel; Stephan Kemp; Marjo S van der Knaap; Marc Engelen Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Jordana Hughes; Vilija Jokubaitis; Alessandra Lugaresi; Raymond Hupperts; Guillermo Izquierdo; Alexandre Prat; Marc Girard; Pierre Duquette; Francois Grand'Maison; Pierre Grammond; Patrizia Sola; Diana Ferraro; Cristina Ramo-Tello; Maria Trojano; Mark Slee; Vahid Shaygannejad; Cavit Boz; Jeanette Lechner-Scott; Vincent Van Pesch; Eugenio Pucci; Claudio Solaro; Freek Verheul; Murat Terzi; Franco Granella; Daniele Spitaleri; Raed Alroughani; Jae-Kwan Jun; Adam Fambiatos; Anneke Van der Walt; Helmut Butzkueven; Tomas Kalincik Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Tomas Kalincik; Ibrahima Diouf; Sifat Sharmin; Charles Malpas; Tim Spelman; Dana Horakova; Eva Kubala Havrdova; Maria Trojano; Guillermo Izquierdo; Alessandra Lugaresi; Alexandre Prat; Marc Girard; Pierre Duquette; Pierre Grammond; Vilija Jokubaitis; Anneke van der Walt; Francois Grand'Maison; Patrizia Sola; Diana Ferraro; Vahid Shaygannejad; Raed Alroughani; Raymond Hupperts; Murat Terzi; Cavit Boz; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Eugenio Pucci; Vincent Van Pesch; Franco Granella; Roberto Bergamaschi; Daniele Spitaleri; Mark Slee; Steve Vucic; Radek Ampapa; Pamela McCombe; Cristina Ramo-Tello; Julie Prevost; Javier Olascoaga; Edgardo Cristiano; Michael Barnett; Maria Laura Saladino; Jose Luis Sanchez-Menoyo; Suzanne Hodgkinson; Csilla Rozsa; Stella Hughes; Fraser Moore; Cameron Shaw; Ernest Butler; Olga Skibina; Orla Gray; Allan Kermode; Tunde Csepany; Bhim Singhal; Neil Shuey; Imre Piroska; Bruce Taylor; Magdolna Simo; Carmen-Adella Sirbu; Attila Sas; Helmut Butzkueven Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-12-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marcus D'Souza; Saskia Steinheimer; Jonas Dorn; Cecily Morrison; Jacques Boisvert; Kristina Kravalis; Jessica Burggraaff; Caspar Ep van Munster; Manuela Diederich; Abigail Sellen; Christian P Kamm; Frank Dahlke; Bernard Mj Uitdehaag; Ludwig Kappos Journal: Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Date: 2018-08-09
Authors: Irene C Huffnagel; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Georges E Janssens; Michel van Weeghel; Björn M van Geel; Bwee Tien Poll-The; Stephan Kemp; Marc Engelen Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Wouter J C van Ballegoij; Sander C Kuijpers; Irene C Huffnagel; Henry C Weinstein; Bwee Tien Poll-The; Marc Engelen; Carlien A M Bennebroek; Frank D Verbraak Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 4.849