Literature DB >> 2736380

Interactions between cattle and badgers at pasture with reference to bovine tuberculosis transmission.

P F Benham, D M Broom.   

Abstract

The normal behaviour of badgers, as described here, would not result in direct transmission of tuberculosis from badgers to cattle via air expired by badgers or via bodily contact. All activities of wild badgers in cattle fields at three different sites were observed at night for a total of 359 h. In addition, all activities of pairs of wild caught badgers were observed in a 0.5 ha enclosure with an artificial sett on 20 nights when cattle were present. Badger foraging in cattle fields was infrequent during dry conditions and variable at other times. Clover fields were preferred to grass pastures in two autumnal studies and under dry conditions the badgers did not prefer to forage on short pasture. Badgers consistently avoided close contact with cattle by changing routes from sett to foraging site and by foraging much less in areas of fields occupied by cattle. When foraging they preferred to remain at least 10-15 m from cattle and they avoided compact groups of cattle more than individuals. Some cattle would move towards badgers, especially if they were carrying out unusual behaviour, but badgers fled rapidly from every approach. In all potential encounters badgers were able to keep at least 2-3 m from approaching cattle. Badgers in the artificial sett delayed entering the enclosure if cattle were within 15 m of the entrance. When cattle were managed on a strip-grazing (rotational) system the whole area which they occupied was avoided by the badgers. However, badgers came closer to individual cattle and foraged in areas grazed by the cattle more if the cattle were set-stocked. If cattle are managed so that they are concentrated in a small area (rotational) system the risk of disease transmission is minimized because they are less likely to encounter badgers or their fresh products than are cattle managed on a large area (set-stocked) system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2736380     DOI: 10.1016/0007-1935(89)90075-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Vet J        ISSN: 0007-1935


  7 in total

1.  Effectiveness of biosecurity measures in preventing badger visits to farm buildings.

Authors:  Johanna Judge; Robbie A McDonald; Neil Walker; Richard J Delahay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  The role of badgers in the epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infection (tuberculosis) in cattle in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland: current perspectives on control strategies.

Authors:  Deirdre Ní Bhuachalla; Leigh Al Corner; Simon J More; Eamonn Gormley
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2014-12-19

3.  Interspecific visitation of cattle and badgers to fomites: A transmission risk for bovine tuberculosis?

Authors:  Emma L Campbell; Andrew W Byrne; Fraser D Menzies; Kathryn R McBride; Carl M McCormick; Michael Scantlebury; Neil Reid
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  A review of risk factors for bovine tuberculosis infection in cattle in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Broughan; J Judge; E Ely; R J Delahay; G Wilson; R S Clifton-Hadley; A V Goodchild; H Bishop; J E Parry; S H Downs
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Patterns of direct and indirect contact between cattle and badgers naturally infected with tuberculosis.

Authors:  J A Drewe; H M O'Connor; N Weber; R A McDonald; R J Delahay
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Contact networks in a wildlife-livestock host community: identifying high-risk individuals in the transmission of bovine TB among badgers and cattle.

Authors:  Monika Böhm; Michael R Hutchings; Piran C L White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Towards a unified generic framework to define and observe contacts between livestock and wildlife: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sonny A Bacigalupo; Linda K Dixon; Simon Gubbins; Adam J Kucharski; Julian A Drewe
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.