Literature DB >> 27363636

Ergonomic analysis of primary and assistant surgical roles.

Ahmed M Zihni1, Jaime A Cavallo2, Shuddhadeb Ray2, Ikechukwu Ohu3, Sohyung Cho3, Michael M Awad2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with a high degree of ergonomic stress. However, the stress associated with surgical assisting is not known. In this study, we compare the ergonomic stress associated with primary and assistant surgical roles during laparoscopic surgery. We hypothesize that higher ergonomic stress will be detected in the primary operating surgeon when compared with the surgical assistant.
METHODS: One right-hand dominant attending surgeon performed 698 min of laparoscopic surgery over 13 procedures (222 min primary and 476 min assisting), whereas electromyography data were collected from bilateral biceps, triceps, deltoids, and trapezius muscles. Data were analyzed in 1-min segments. Average muscle activation as quantified by maximal voluntary contraction (%MVC) was calculated for each muscle group during primary surgery and assisting. We compared mean %MVC values with unpaired t-tests.
RESULTS: Activation of right (R) biceps and triceps muscle groups is significantly elevated while operating when compared with assisting (R biceps primary: 5.47 ± 0.21 %MVC, assistant: 3.93 ± 0.11, P < 0.001; R triceps primary: 6.53 ± 0.33 %MVC, assistant: 5.48 ± 0.18, P = 0.002). Mean activation of the left trapezius muscle group is elevated during assisting (primary: 4.33 ± 0.26 %MVC, assistant: 5.70 ± 0.40, P = 0.024). No significance difference was noted in the other muscle groups (R deltoid, R trapezius, left [L] biceps, L triceps, and L deltoid).
CONCLUSIONS: We used surface electromyography to quantify ergonomic differences between operating and assisting. Surgical assisting was associated with similar and occasionally higher levels of muscle activation compared with primary operating. These findings suggest that surgical assistants face significant ergonomic stress, just as operating surgeons do. Steps must be taken to recognize and mitigate this stress in both operating surgeons and assistants.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Electromyography; Ergonomics; Human factors; Laparoscopic surgery; Surgical assistants

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27363636     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  2 in total

1.  Effect of Patient Body Mass Index on Laparoscopic Surgical Ergonomics.

Authors:  Zhe Liang; William D Gerull; Robert Wang; Ahmed Zihni; Shuddhadeb Ray; Michael Awad
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Solving the surgeon ergonomic crisis with surgical exosuit.

Authors:  Shanglei Liu; Daniel Hemming; Ran B Luo; Jessica Reynolds; Jonathan C Delong; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.