Literature DB >> 27363496

Prognostic values of four Notch receptor mRNA expression in gastric cancer.

Xiaoyu Wu1, Wentao Liu2, Ding Tang3, Haijuan Xiao4, Zhenfeng Wu1, Che Chen1, Xuequan Yao1, Fukun Liu1, Gang Li5.   

Abstract

Notch ligands and receptors are frequently deregulated in several human malignancies including gastric cancer. The activation of Notch signaling has been reported to contribute to gastric carcinogenesis and progression. However, the prognostic roles of individual Notch receptors in gastric cancer patients remain elusive. In the current study, we accessed the prognostic roles of four Notch receptors, Notch 1-4, in gastric cancer patients through "The Kaplan-Meier plotter" (KM plotter) database, in which updated gene expression data and survival information include a total of 876 gastric cancer patients. All four Notch receptors' high mRNA expression was found to be correlated to worsen overall survival (OS) for all gastric cancer patients followed for 20 years. We further accessed the prognostic roles of individual Notch receptors in different clinicopathological features using Lauren classification, pathological grades, clinical grades, HER2 status and different choices of treatments of gastric cancer patients. These results indicate that there are critical prognostic values of the four Notch receptors in gastric cancer. This information will be useful for better understanding of the heterogeneity and complexity in the molecular biology of gastric cancer and to develop tools to more accurately predict their prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27363496      PMCID: PMC4929462          DOI: 10.1038/srep28044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death, and 800,000 cancer-related deaths are caused by gastric cancer each year globally1 Despite the advances in early detection, radical cure operation, and multimodal therapeutic modalities, at diagnosis, gastric cancer remains difficult to cure and prognosis remains poor with a median overall survival of 12 months for advanced disease in Western countries23. About 40–60% patients with gastric cancer received radical operation will often have postoperative recurrence and metastasis4. Therefore, in order to improve the clinical outcome of gastric cancer patients, the identification of the molecular mechanism during the incidence and progression of gastric cancer, as well as identification of prognostic biomarkers and drug targets are still needed and will help to select patients with higher chances of gastric cancer recurrence and provide better prognosis and individualized treatments. The Notch signaling pathway is one of key pathways constituting the stem cell signaling network and is a highly conserved system that regulates cell-fate decisions and the maintenance of stem cells56. DLL1, DLL3, DLL4, JAG1 and JAG2, typical Notch ligands, and four Notch receptors (Notch 1–4) are frequently deregulated in several human malignancies and have been found in breast, colon, cervical, head and neck, lung, pancreatic, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, renal carcinoma, acute myeloid, Hodgkin and Large-cell lymphomas, as well as gastric cancer789101112. A number of studies have shown that the activation of Notch signaling plays a critical role in gastric cancer initiation, progression and cross-talks with other signaling pathways, contributing to the apoptosis inhibition, development, angiogenesis, metastasis and chemoresistance of gastric cancer7131415161718. However, the prognostic roles of individual Notch receptors, especially at the mRNA level in gastric cancer patients remains elusive. In the current study, we accessed the prognostic roles of four Notch receptors in human gastric cancer patients by the Kaplan-Meier plotter (KM plotter). KM plotter generated data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database. This database includes gene expression data and survival information from a total of 876 gastric cancer patients. KM plotter can be utilized for the analysis of individual genes with clinical results to relapse-free survival and total survival of the patients. So far, a number of genes have been identified and/or validated by KM plotter in lung cancer19202122, breast cancer2223242526272829303132, and ovarian cancer223334. In this study, we used KM plotter database and accessed the prognostic roles of individual Notch receptor mRNA expression in human gastric cancer patients.

Material and Methods

An online database35 (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) was used to determine the relevance of individual Notch receptor mRNA expression to the overall survival (OS). OS is the length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment for a cancer patient, that patients diagnosed with the cancer are still alive. In a clinical trial, measuring the OS is one of important ways to see how well a new treatment works. Currently, they established breast cancer35, lung cancer19, ovarian cancer36 and gastric cancer data. All cancer patients in the database were identified from Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG, http://cabig.cancer.gov/, microarray samples are published in the caArray project), the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, http://cancergenome.nih.gov) cancer datasets19. They collected clinical data including gender, perforation history, Lauren classification, differentiation, stage, HER2 status and treatment. The database was established using gene expression data and survival information of 876 gastric cancer patients downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Briefly, four Notch sub-members (Notch1, Notch2, Notch3 and Notch4) were entered into the database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/index.php?p=service&cancer=gastric) to obtain Kaplan-Meier survival plots in which the number-at-risk is indicated below the main plot. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals, as well as log rank P were calculated and displayed on the webpage. P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. HR is the ratio of the hazard rates corresponding to the conditions described by two levels of an explanatory variable in survival analysis.

Results

Mammals possess four different notch receptors, referred to as Notch1, Notch2, Notch3 and Notch4. All Notch receptors Kaplan-Meier survival information can be found in www.kmplot.com. We first accessed the prognostic value of Notch1 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 218902_at (Notch1). Survival curves were plotted for gastric cancer patients (n = 876) (Fig. 1A), for intestinal type cancer patients (n = 320) (Fig. 1B), and for diffuse type cancer patients (n = 241) (Fig. 1C). Notch1′s high mRNA expression was found to be correlated to worsen OS for all gastric cancer patients followed for 20 years, HR 1.38 (1.16–1.64), p = 0.00022. Notch1 high mRNA expression was also found to be correlated to worsen OS in intestinal type cancer patients, HR 1.82 (1.25–2.64), p = 0.0014, but not in diffuse type cancer patients, HR 1.37 (0.96–1.94), p = 0.078.
Figure 1

Determination of prognostic value of Notch1 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 218902_at (Notch1).

(A) Survival curves are plotted for all gastric cancer patients (n = n = 876). (B) Survival curves are plotted for intestinal type cancer patients (n = 320). (C) Survival curves are plotted for diffuse type cancer patients (n = 241).

We then accessed the prognostic value of Notch2 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 210756_s_at (Notch2). Notch2′ high mRNA expression was found to be significantly correlated to worsen OS for all gastric cancer patients, HR 1.58 (1.31–1.89), p = 6.5e-07 (Fig. 2A), as well as in intestinal type cancer patients, HR 2.36 (1.72–3.25), p = 5.3e-08 (Fig. 2B), and in diffuse type cancer patients, HR 1.62 (1.15–2.28), p = 0.0051 (Fig. 2C).
Figure 2

Determination of prognostic value of Notch2 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com.

The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 210756_s_at (Notch2). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all gastric cancer patients (n = n = 876). (B) Survival curves are plotted for intestinal type cancer patients (n = 320). (C) Survival curves are plotted for diffuse type cancer patients (n = 241).

Figure 3 showed the prognostic value of Notch3 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 203237_at (Notch3). Notch3′ high mRNA expression was found to be significantly correlated to worsen OS for all gastric cancer patients, HR 1.6 (1.31–1.97), p = 5.3e-06 (Fig. 3A), as well as in intestinal type cancer patients, HR 2.03 (1.36–3.03), p = 0.00039 (Fig. 3B), and diffuse type cancer patients, HR 1.5 (1.06–2.11), p = 0.02 (Fig. 3C).
Figure 3

Determination of prognostic value of Notch3 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com.

The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 203237_at (Notch3). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all gastric cancer patients (n = n = 876). (B) Survival curves are plotted for intestinal type cancer patients (n = 320). (C) Survival curves are plotted for diffuse type cancer patients (n = 241).

Figure 4 showed the prognostic value of Notch4 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 205247_at (Notch4). Notch4′s high mRNA expression was also found to be significantly correlated to worsen OS for all gastric cancer patients, HR 1.98 (1.64–2.4), p = 9.3e-13 (Fig. 4A), intestinal type cancer patients, HR 2.47 (1.77–3.64), p = 4.6e-08 (Fig. 4B), and diffuse type cancer patients, HR 1.81 (1.18–2.76), p = 0.0054 (Fig. 4C).
Figure 4

Determination of prognostic value of Notch4 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com.

The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 205247_at (Notch4). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all gastric cancer patients (n = n = 876). (B) Survival curves are plotted for intestinal type cancer patients (n = 320). (C) Survival curves are plotted for diffuse type cancer patients (n = 241).

For further access to the correlation of individual Notch receptors with other clinicopathological features, we accessed the correlation with gender (Table 1), pathological grades (Table 2), clinical grades (Table 3), HER2 status (Table 4) and different choices of treatments (Table 5) of gastric cancer patients. As from Table 1, all the individual Notch receptors did not show significant difference of prognosis in different gender positive gastric cancer patients. From Table 2, all the individual Notch receptors except Notch 2 were not significantly associated with pathological grades of gastric cancer patients. Notch 2′s high mRNA expression was associated with worsen OS in grade I gastric cancer patients, HR 10.5 (1.4–78.81), p = 0.0046. From Table 3, Notch 1′s high mRNA high expression was associated with worsen OS in grade II, HR 1.95 (1.04–3.64), p = 0.033 and grade III, HR 1.49 (1.07–2.06), p = 0.017. Notch 2′s high mRNA expression was associated with worsen OS in grade II, HR 2.26 (1.23–4.14), p = 0.0066 and grade III, HR 2.03 (1.46–2.82), p = 1.7e-05. Notch 3′s high mRNA expression was associated with worsen OS in grade III, HR 1.8 (1.26–2.57), p = 0.0011. Notch 4′s high mRNA expression was associated with worsen OS in grade I, HR 3.7 × 108 (0.0-inf), p = 0.0035, grade II, HR 2.32 (1.26–4.25), p = 0.0052 and grade III, HR 1.83 (1.31–2.54), p = 0.00028. From Table 4, all the individual Notch receptors except Notch 3 were significantly associated with worsen OS in either HER2 negative or HER2 positive gastric cancer patients. Notch 3′s high mRNA expression was only significantly associated with worsen OS in HER2 negative gastric cancer patients, HR 1.57 (1.22–2.01), p = 0.00043. From Table 5, Notch 1′s high mRNA expression was associated with worsen OS in surgery alone gastric cancer patients, HR 1.4 (1.02–1.93), p = 0.037; as well as 5-FU based adjuvant gastric cancer patients, HR 1.53 (1.07–2.19), p = 0.019. Notch 2′s high mRNA expression was only associated with better OS in 5-FU based adjuvant gastric cancer patients, HR 0.61 (0.43–0.87), p = 0.0059. Notch 3′s high mRNA expression was only associated with worsen OS in surgery alone gastric cancer patients, HR 1.42 (1.00–2.02), p = 0.048. Notch 4 s’ high mRNA expression was also only associated with worsen OS in surgery alone gastric cancer patients, HR 2.12 (1.48–3.03), p = 2.7e-05.
Table 1

Correlation of Notch receptor mRNA high expression with gender of gastric cancer patients.

Notch receptorsTreatmentCasesHR 95% CIP value
Notch1Male5451.32 (1.06–1.63)0.012
Female2361.73 (1.22–2.47)0.0021
Notch2Male5451.9 (1.51–2.38)1.8e-08
Female2361.73 (1.12–2.67)0.012
Notch3Male5451.49 (1.16–1.92)0.0019
Female2361.71 (1.13–2.59)0.011
Notch4Male5452.21 (1.74–2.8)3e-15
Female2362.43 (1.47–4.01)0.00032
Table 2

Correlation of Notch receptor mRNA high expression with pathological grades of gastric cancer patients.

Notch receptorsPathological gradesCasesHR 95% CIP value
Notch 1I322.18 (0.9–5.28)0.076
II670.76 (0.39–1.48)0.41
III1651.31 (0.84–2.05)0.24
Notch 2I3210.5 (1.4–78.81)0.0046
II671.68 (0.87–3.21)0.12
III1651.37 (0.92–2.05)0.12
Notch 3I321.28 (0.54–3.03)0.57
II671.5 (0.76–2.97)0.24
III1651.3 (0.84–2.03)0.24
Notch 4I321.72 (0.69–4.27)0.24
II671.52 (0.79–2.94)0.2
III1650.8 (0.53–1.2)0.28
Table 3

Correlation of Notch receptor mRNA high expression with clinical stages of gastric cancer patients.

Notch receptorsClinical stagesCasesHR 95% CIP value
Notch11673.17 (0.9–11.19)0.058
21401.95 (1.04–3.64)0.033
33051.49 (1.07–2.06)0.017
41480.73 (0.49–1.07)0.1
Notch21672.1 (0.75–5.83)0.15
21402.26 (1.23–4.14)0.0066
33052.03 (1.46–2.82)1.7e-05
41481.33 (0.87–2.03)0.19
Notch31672.76 (0.79–9.71)0.098
21400.55 (0.28–1.08)0.077
33051.8 (1.26–2.57)0.0011
41481.4 (0.94–2.11)0.1
Notch41673.7 × 108 (0.0-inf)0.0035
21402.32 (1.26–4.25)0.0052
33051.83 (1.31–2.54)0.00028
41481.56 (0.97–2.51)0.062
Table 4

Correlation of Notch receptor mRNA high expression with HER2 status of gastric cancer patients.

Notch receptorsHER2 statusCasesHR 95% CIP value
Notch1Negative5321.32 (1.05–1.65)0.016
Positive3441.58 (1.2–2.09)0.0011
Notch2Negative5321.53 (1.22–1.93)0.00023
Positive3441.44 (1.07–1.96)0.017
Notch3Negative5321.57 (1.22–2.01)0.00043
Positive3441.31 (0.98–1.76)0.065
Notch4Negative5322.03 (1.61–2.57)1.7e-09
Positive3441.62 (1.25–2.1)0.00025
Table 5

Correlation of Notch receptor mRNA high expression with different treatment of gastric cancer patients.

Notch receptorsTreatmentCasesHR 95% CIP value
Notch1Surgery alone3801.4 (1.02–1.93)0.037
5-FU based Adjuvant1531.53 (1.07–2.19)0.019
Notch2Surgery alone3801.34 (0.98–1.85)0.068
5-FU based Adjuvant1530.61 (0.43–0.87)0.0059
Notch3Surgery alone3801.42 (1.00–2.02)0.048
5-FU based Adjuvant1530.82 (0.56–1.21)0.31
Surgery alone3802.12 (1.48–3.03)2.7e-05
Notch45-FU based Adjuvant1531.22 (0.85–1.74)0.27

Discussion

Among four Notch receptors and ligands, Notch1 is relatively the most studied member of Notch signaling in gastric carcinogenesis7373839. With the active form of Notch 1, the Notch 1 intracellular domain (NICD) was frequently expressed in gastric cancer cell lines, and the depletion of Notch 1 by Notch 1 siRNA led to growth inhibition of gastric cancer cells1740. Down-regulation of Notch1 expression by gamma-secretase inhibition (N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl)-l-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester, DAPT) was also able to substantially inhibit migration, invasion, and proliferation, as well as epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer cell lines41. Changes in the expression of the Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD) differentially expressed in gastric cancer, and the aberrant expression of Notch1 NICD is associated with an advanced tumor stage, tumor metastasis and overall patient survival42. Du et al.43 performed a meta-analysis and showed that the expression of Notch1 protein was significantly higher in tumor tissues of gastric cancer compared to normal tissues. Specifically, stratified analyses showed that significantly increased expression of Notch1 was associated with non-cardia location, >5 cm size, diffuse type, positive lymphovascular invasion and distal metastasis, indicating that Notch1 protein may be an oncogene. Recently, Bauer et al.44 reported that primarily resected patients with Notch1 protein-negative tumors demonstrated worse survival and high Notch1protein expression was associated with early-stage tumors and associated with significantly increased survival in this subgroup. Their results supported that Notch1 expression indicated good prognosis in gastric cancer patients. However, whether or not Notch1 mRNA has a prognostic role in gastric cancer patients remains elusive. In this report, Notch1′s high mRNA expression was found to be correlated to worsen OS for all gastric cancer patients followed for 20 years. Notch1′s high mRNA expression was also found to be correlated to worsen OS in intestinal type cancer patients, but not in diffuse type cancer patients. Notch2 activation was observed in 10.0% (1 of 10) of noncancerous endoscopic mucosa, 71.4% (30 of 42) in premalignant lesions, and 97.3% (72 of 74) in gastric cancer tissues, demonstrating a correlation of Notch2 expression with both intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer formation45. Constitutive expression of Notch2 NICD promoted both cell proliferation and xenografted tumor growth of human gastric adenocarcinoma SC-M1 cells46. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated a chemotherapy-associated increase in the intensity of Notch2 staining, indicating a prominent role for Notch2 in chemotherapy resistance of gastric cancer47. Above results indicate that Notch2 seems to be a tumor oncogene in gastric carcinogenesis. Du et al.43 reported that the expression of Notch2 protein significantly was higher in tumor tissues of gastric cancer compared to normal tissues. However, Bauer et al.44 reported that higher Notch2 protein expression was associated with early-stage and intestinal-type tumors and with associated better survival in the subgroup of intestinal-type tumors. Their results support that Notch2 expression with early tumor stages suggest that Notch2 may act as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer. However, there is no report about the prognostic significance of Notch2 mRNA expression in gastric cancer. In this report, Notch2′s high mRNA expression was found to be significantly correlated to worsen OS for all gastric cancer patients, as well as in intestinal type cancer patients and in diffuse type cancer patients. The study about Notch3 in gastric cancer is limited43. The expression of Notch3 protein was observed to be associated with the intestinal/glandular differentiation of gastric carcinoma cells, suggesting a role as a possible favorable prognostic indicator48. In this report, our results show that Notch3′s high mRNA expression was significantly correlated to worsen OS for all gastric cancer patients, as well as in intestinal type cancer patients and diffuse type cancer patients. Same as Notch3, the study about Notch4 in gastric cancer is also limited. In a recent report49, Notch4 activation was observed to promote gastric cancer growth in vitro and in vivo, while Notch4 inhibition using Notch4 siRNA had opposite effects. In addition, Notch4 activation induced expression and activation of Wnt1, β-catenin and downstream target genes, c-Myc and cyclin D1, in gastric cancer cells, while Notch4 inhibition had opposite effects. Wnt1 is one of WNT members that regulates various processes including tumor initiation, tumor growth, cell senescence, cell death, differentiation and metastasis5051. β-catenin is the primary transducer of canonical WNT signals to the nucleus and is involved in the development and progression of a significant proportion of gastric cancer cases5253. Activation of the cyclin D1 oncogene, often by amplification or rearrangement, is a central mediator in the transition from G1 to S phase and a major driver of multiple types of human tumors including gastric cancer545556. These results indicate that Notch4 seems to be a tumor oncogene in gastric carcinogenesis. In this report, we observed that Notch4′s high mRNA expression was also found to be significantly correlated to worsen OS for all gastric cancer patients, intestinal type cancer patients, and diffuse type of cancer patients. The HER2/neu proto-oncogene (also known as c-erbB-2) encodes a 185 kDa transmembrane glycoprotein receptor known as HER2/neu or p185,HER2 partial homology with EGFR. HER2/neu shares a receptor with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity and has been implicated in cancer with special emphasis in breast cancer5758. HER2 overexpression was detected in 6% to 35% of GC patients and led to the advent of targeted therapy with anti HER2 antibody like Trastusumab which has improved the overall survival5960. In this study, we found that all the individual Notch receptors except Notch 3 are significantly associated with worsen OS in either HER2 negative or HER2 positive gastric cancer patients. Notch 3′s high mRNA expression is only significantly associated with worsen OS in HER2 negative gastric cancer patients. The connection between Notch signaling and carcinogenesis, as well as its crosstalk with many oncogenic signaling pathways suggest that Notch signaling, especially some Notch receptors may be candidate for drug target of gastric cancer. A number of γ-secretase inhibitors were demonstrated to inhibit Notch activation and cell growth in gastric cancer cells41456162. The treatment combination of γ-secretase inhibitor and 5-FU was shown to be better than that with the single treatment in the inhibition of gastric cancer cell proliferation61. Therefore, Notch expression status could also impact the treatment efficiency of 5-FU based adjuvant therapy and/or prognosis of gastric cancer patients. In this study, we observed that Notch 1 mRNA high expression is associated with worsen OS in surgery alone gastric cancer patients and 5-FU based adjuvant gastric cancer patients. Notch 3 and Notch 4′s high mRNA expression is only associated with worsen OS in surgery alone for gastric cancer patients. Interestingly, Notch 2′s high mRNA expression is only associated with better OS in 5-FU based adjuvant gastric cancer patients. In summary, by using the KM plotter database, we accessed the prognostic roles of four Notch receptors in gastric cancer patients through KM plotter, in which updated gene expression data and survival information included data from a total of 876 gastric cancer patients. All four Notch receptors’ high mRNA expression was found to be correlated to worsen overall survival (OS) for all gastric cancer patients followed for 20 years. We further accessed the prognostic roles of individual Notch receptors in different clinicopathological features including Lauren classification, pathological grades, clinical grades, HER2 status and different choices of treatments of gastric cancer patients. These results indicate that there are critical prognostic values of Notch 1–4 receptors in gastric cancer. This information will be useful for the better understanding of the heterogeneity and complexity in the molecular biology of gastric cancer and to develop tools to more accurately predict their prognosis.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Wu, X. et al. Prognostic values of four Notch receptor mRNA expression in gastric cancer. Sci. Rep. 6, 28044; doi: 10.1038/srep28044 (2016).
  62 in total

Review 1.  Notch signaling.

Authors:  Lucio Miele
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Targeted therapy for gastric cancer: molecular pathways and ongoing investigations.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Alexander Raufi; Samuel J Klempner
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-05-22

Review 3.  Role of chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer: an individual-patient-data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koji Oba; Xavier Paoletti; Yung-Jue Bang; Harry Bleiberg; Tomasz Burzykowski; Nozomu Fuse; Stefan Michiels; Satoshi Morita; Yasuo Ohashi; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Philippe Rougier; Junichi Sakamoto; Daniel Sargent; Mitsuru Sasako; Kohei Shitara; Akira Tsuburaya; Eric Van Cutsem; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 4.  New prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Adam Adam Maciejczyk
Journal:  Adv Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.727

Review 5.  Epigenetic silencing of Notch signaling in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Giulia Piazzi; Franco Bazzoli; Luigi Ricciardiello
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Beyond β-catenin: prospects for a larger catenin network in the nucleus.

Authors:  Pierre D McCrea; Cara J Gottardi
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Proteomic analysis of acquired tamoxifen resistance in MCF-7 cells reveals expression signatures associated with enhanced migration.

Authors:  Changhua Zhou; Qiu Zhong; Lyndsay V Rhodes; Ian Townley; Melyssa R Bratton; Qiang Zhang; Elizabeth C Martin; Steven Elliott; Bridgette M Collins-Burow; Matthew E Burow; Guangdi Wang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Elevated C1orf63 expression is correlated with CDK10 and predicts better outcome for advanced breast cancers: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Chao-Qun Hong; Fan Zhang; Yan-Jie You; Wei-Li Qiu; Armando E Giuliano; Xiao-Jiang Cui; Guo-Jun Zhang; Yu-Kun Cui
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Clinical Significance of NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 Expression in Gastric Carcinomas: An Immunohistochemical Study.

Authors:  Lukas Bauer; Agnes Takacs; Julia Slotta-Huspenina; Rupert Langer; Karen Becker; Alexander Novotny; Katja Ott; Axel Walch; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Gisela Keller
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Differential expression of Notch1 intracellular domain and p21 proteins, and their clinical significance in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ding-Hai Luo; Qin Zhou; Sun-Kuan Hu; Yi-Qun Xia; Chao-Chao Xu; Tie-Su Lin; Yu-Ting Pan; Jian-Sheng Wu; Rong Jin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.967

View more
  17 in total

1.  NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 regulate epithelial cell proliferation in mouse and human gastric corpus.

Authors:  Elise S Demitrack; Gail B Gifford; Theresa M Keeley; Nobukatsu Horita; Andrea Todisco; D Kim Turgeon; Christian W Siebel; Linda C Samuelson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Evaluation of Important Molecular Pathways and Candidate Diagnostic Biomarkers of Noninvasive to Invasive Stages in Gastric Cancer by In Silico Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Tutunchi; Saeedeh Akhavan; Ahmad Bereimipour; Sayyed Mohammad Hossein Ghaderian
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 3.  NOTCH receptors in gastric and other gastrointestinal cancers: oncogenes or tumor suppressors?

Authors:  Tingting Huang; Yuhang Zhou; Alfred S L Cheng; Jun Yu; Ka Fai To; Wei Kang
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 27.401

4.  Distinct prognostic values of S100 mRNA expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shizhen Zhang; Zhen Wang; Weiwei Liu; Rui Lei; Jinlan Shan; Ling Li; Xiaochen Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prognostic roles of mRNA expression of notch receptors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jianwen Xiong; Xiaoqiang Zhang; Xianglai Chen; Yiping Wei; De-Guo Lu; Yun-Wei Han; Jianjun Xu; Dongliang Yu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-21

6.  Distinct prognosis of mRNA expression of the five RecQ DNA-helicase family members - RECQL, BLM, WRN, RECQL4, and RECQL5 - in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Huihui Chen; Yi Yang; Chunjing Xu; Jun Zhou; Jiaojiao Zhou; Yiding Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Notch signaling pathway regulates CD4+CD25+CD127dim/- regulatory T cells and T helper 17 cells function in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Ke-Lei Zhao; Lei Qin; Dan-Xia Ji; Bin Zhang; Peng-Fei Zheng; Yong-Mei Qin
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Loss of nuclear NOTCH1, but not its negative regulator NUMB, is an independent predictor of cervical malignancy.

Authors:  Elenaé Vázquez-Ulloa; Ana Clara Ramos-Cruz; Diddier Prada; Alejandro Avilés-Salas; Alma Delia Chávez-Blanco; Luis A Herrera; Marcela Lizano; Adriana Contreras-Paredes
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-10

9.  The function of Notch1 intracellular domain in the differentiation of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sunkuan Hu; Qiuxiang Chen; Tiesu Lin; Wandong Hong; Wenzhi Wu; Ming Wu; Xiaojing Du; Rong Jin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Prognostic values of the mRNA expression of natural killer receptor ligands and their association with clinicopathological features in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Ali Abouelghar; Reem Hasnah; Ghina Taouk; Mohamad Saad; Manale Karam
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.