Literature DB >> 27363008

Facing competition: Neural mechanisms underlying parallel programming of antisaccades and prosaccades.

Tobias Talanow1, Anna-Maria Kasparbauer2, Maria Steffens3, Inga Meyhöfer4, Bernd Weber5, Nikolaos Smyrnis6, Ulrich Ettinger7.   

Abstract

The antisaccade task is a prominent tool to investigate the response inhibition component of cognitive control. Recent theoretical accounts explain performance in terms of parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous saccades, linked to the horse race metaphor. Previous studies have tested the hypothesis of competing saccade signals at the behavioral level by selectively slowing the programming of endogenous or exogenous processes e.g. by manipulating the probability of antisaccades in an experimental block. To gain a better understanding of inhibitory control processes in parallel saccade programming, we analyzed task-related eye movements and blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responses obtained using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 3T from 16 healthy participants in a mixed antisaccade and prosaccade task. The frequency of antisaccade trials was manipulated across blocks of high (75%) and low (25%) antisaccade frequency. In blocks with high antisaccade frequency, antisaccade latencies were shorter and error rates lower whilst prosaccade latencies were longer and error rates were higher. At the level of BOLD, activations in the task-related saccade network (left inferior parietal lobe, right inferior parietal sulcus, left precentral gyrus reaching into left middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal junction) and deactivations in components of the default mode network (bilateral temporal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex) compensated increased cognitive control demands. These findings illustrate context dependent mechanisms underlying the coordination of competing decision signals in volitional gaze control.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antisaccade; Cognitive control; Eye-tracking; Race model; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27363008     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  5 in total

1.  Effects of nicotine on response inhibition and interference control.

Authors:  Ulrich Ettinger; Eliana Faiola; Anna-Maria Kasparbauer; Nadine Petrovsky; Raymond C K Chan; Roman Liepelt; Veena Kumari
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Alterations in intrinsic fronto-thalamo-parietal connectivity are associated with cognitive control deficits in psychotic disorders.

Authors:  Rebekka Lencer; Li Yao; James L Reilly; Sarah K Keedy; Jennifer E McDowell; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Elliot S Gershon; Brett A Clementz; Su Lui; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Antisaccade and prosaccade eye movements in individuals clinically at risk for psychosis: comparison with first-episode schizophrenia and prediction of conversion.

Authors:  Luca Kleineidam; Ingo Frommann; Stephan Ruhrmann; Joachim Klosterkötter; Anke Brockhaus-Dumke; Wolfgang Wölwer; Wolfgang Gaebel; Wolfgang Maier; Michael Wagner; Ulrich Ettinger
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Cognitive Control of Saccadic Selection and Inhibition from within the Core Cortical Saccadic Network.

Authors:  Andreas Jarvstad; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Relationships between neuropsychological and antisaccade measures in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Marisa Borges Ferreira; Paulo Alexandre Pereira; Marta Parreira; Ines Sousa; José Figueiredo; João José Cerqueira; Antonio Filipe Macedo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.