Literature DB >> 27362977

Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on High Order Statistics Aggregation.

David Doermann.   

Abstract

Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) research aims to develop a perceptual model to evaluate the quality of distorted images automatically and accurately without access to the non-distorted reference images. The state-of-the-art general purpose BIQA methods can be classified into two categories according to the types of features used. The first includes handcrafted features which rely on the statistical regularities of natural images. These, however, are not suitable for images containing text and artificial graphics. The second includes learning-based features which invariably require large codebook or supervised codebook updating procedures to obtain satisfactory performance. These are time-consuming and not applicable in practice. In this paper, we propose a novel general purpose BIQA method based on high order statistics aggregation (HOSA), requiring only a small codebook. HOSA consists of three steps. First, local normalized image patches are extracted as local features through a regular grid, and a codebook containing 100 codewords is constructed by K-means clustering. In addition to the mean of each cluster, the diagonal covariance and coskewness (i.e., dimension-wise variance and skewness) of clusters are also calculated. Second, each local feature is softly assigned to several nearest clusters and the differences of high order statistics (mean, variance and skewness) between local features and corresponding clusters are softly aggregated to build the global quality aware image representation. Finally, support vector regression is adopted to learn the mapping between perceptual features and subjective opinion scores. The proposed method has been extensively evaluated on ten image databases with both simulated and realistic image distortions, and shows highly competitive performance to the state-of-the-art BIQA methods.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27362977     DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2016.2585880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process        ISSN: 1057-7149            Impact factor:   10.856


  9 in total

1.  Artifact- and content-specific quality assessment for MRI with image rulers.

Authors:  Ke Lei; Ali B Syed; Xucheng Zhu; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  A Underwater Sequence Image Dataset for Sharpness and Color Analysis.

Authors:  Miao Yang; Ge Yin; Haiwen Wang; Jinnai Dong; Zhuoran Xie; Bing Zheng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  RCoNet: Deformable Mutual Information Maximization and High-Order Uncertainty-Aware Learning for Robust COVID-19 Detection.

Authors:  Shunjie Dong; Qianqian Yang; Yu Fu; Mei Tian; Cheng Zhuo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 10.451

4.  Fusion of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for No-Reference Magnetic Resonance Image Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Igor Stępień; Rafał Obuchowicz; Adam Piórkowski; Mariusz Oszust
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Cross-Domain Feature Similarity Guided Blind Image Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Chenxi Feng; Long Ye; Qin Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Visual Perceptual Quality Assessment Based on Blind Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Ghislain Takam Tchendjou; Emmanuel Simeu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  BMEFIQA: Blind Quality Assessment of Multi-Exposure Fused Images Based on Several Characteristics.

Authors:  Jianping Shi; Hong Li; Caiming Zhong; Zhouyan He; Yeling Ma
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  Critical analysis on the reproducibility of visual quality assessment using deep features.

Authors:  Franz Götz-Hahn; Vlad Hosu; Dietmar Saupe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Subjective and Objective Quality Assessments of Display Products.

Authors:  Huiqing Zhang; Donghao Li; Yibing Yu; Nan Guo
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.524

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.