Literature DB >> 27362898

Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

George A Turini1, Joseph M Brito1, Andrew R Leone1, Dragan Golijanin1, E Bradley Miller1, Gyan Pareek1, Joseph F Renzulli1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Weck Hem-o-lok™ Ligating clip is a routinely used hemostatic tool in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. It has been the practice in our institution to use such clips for hemostasis of the vascular bundles during robotic prostatectomy. Migration of such clips has been reported in the literature as single case reports. In this study, we present a case series of intravesical Weck clip extrusions presenting as bladder calculi. Such events have led to a change in our practice, and more research is needed to assess the impact of this change.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted over the period 2006-2011. Patients included in the study required cystoscopic intervention for removal of encrusted or impacted Weck clips. Primary data points included type of intervention required, time to presentation, and number of presentations. Postoperative anastomotic leak, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and initial operative time were also investigated.
RESULTS: Out of 570 total men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP), eight required return to the operating room for clip extraction (1.4%). Extraction methods included laser lithotripsy, blunt litholapaxy, and grasper extraction. Men experiencing clip migration were hospitalized for a longer period of time (7.6 days vs. 2.1 days, P < .01) and they required more blood transfusions (1.4 units vs. 0.05 units, P < .01) than men who did not experience clip migration. The most common site for clip intrusion was the bladder neck. Average time to presentation was 1.75 years. DISCUSSION: Weck clip migration is a recognized complication of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Men with recurrent urinary tract infection, bothersome voiding symptoms, or hematuria following RALRP should be considered for cystoscopic evaluation. Increased length of hospital stays and the need for a larger volume blood transfusion following prostatectomy were significant predictors of clip migration. More research is needed to determine if implemented changes to our surgical technique have mitigated these risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27362898     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  4 in total

1.  Distal ureteral stone formation over migrated Hem-o-lok clip after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Murat Can Kiremit; Ersin Koseoglu; Omer Acar; Mert Kilic; Yakup Kordan; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Mevlana Derya Balbay; Tarık Esen
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-03-30

2.  Bladder stone following intravesical migration of surgical clip five years after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Julien Sarkis; Marwan Alkassis; Josselin Abi Chebel; Abdelhay Tabcheh; Albert Semaan
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-25

3.  Type II Hem-o-lok clip migration and stone formation in robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy patient: A case report and serial cases review.

Authors:  Andrea Nistiana; Sawkar Vijay Pramod; Ferry Safriadi
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-02

4.  Ligating clip migration after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Shibin Zhu; Huajian Ye; Haiyang Wu; Guoqing Ding; Gonghui Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.