Literature DB >> 27362472

CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites.

Zhenxue Dai1, Hari Viswanathan1, Richard Middleton1, Feng Pan2, William Ampomah3, Changbing Yang4, Wei Jia2, Ting Xiao2, Si-Yong Lee5, Brian McPherson2, Robert Balch3, Reid Grigg3, Mark White6.   

Abstract

Using CO2 in enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) is a promising technology for emissions management because CO2-EOR can dramatically reduce sequestration costs in the absence of emissions policies that include incentives for carbon capture and storage. This study develops a multiscale statistical framework to perform CO2 accounting and risk analysis in an EOR environment at the Farnsworth Unit (FWU), Texas. A set of geostatistical-based Monte Carlo simulations of CO2-oil/gas-water flow and transport in the Morrow formation are conducted for global sensitivity and statistical analysis of the major risk metrics: CO2/water injection/production rates, cumulative net CO2 storage, cumulative oil/gas productions, and CO2 breakthrough time. The median and confidence intervals are estimated for quantifying uncertainty ranges of the risk metrics. A response-surface-based economic model has been derived to calculate the CO2-EOR profitability for the FWU site with a current oil price, which suggests that approximately 31% of the 1000 realizations can be profitable. If government carbon-tax credits are available, or the oil price goes up or CO2 capture and operating expenses reduce, more realizations would be profitable. The results from this study provide valuable insights for understanding CO2 storage potential and the corresponding environmental and economic risks of commercial-scale CO2-sequestration in depleted reservoirs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27362472     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

Review 1.  The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal.

Authors:  Cameron Hepburn; Ella Adlen; John Beddington; Emily A Carter; Sabine Fuss; Niall Mac Dowell; Jan C Minx; Pete Smith; Charlotte K Williams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  An Experimental Investigation of the Risk of Triggering Geological Disasters by Injection under Shear Stress.

Authors:  Yixin Liu; Jiang Xu; Shoujian Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Probabilistic Assessment of Above Zone Pressure Predictions at a Geologic Carbon Storage Site.

Authors:  Argha Namhata; Sergey Oladyshkin; Robert M Dilmore; Liwei Zhang; David V Nakles
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Environmental concern-based site screening of carbon dioxide geological storage in China.

Authors:  Bofeng Cai; Qi Li; Guizhen Liu; Lancui Liu; Taotao Jin; Hui Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Arsenic mobilization in shallow aquifers due to CO2 and brine intrusion from storage reservoirs.

Authors:  Ting Xiao; Zhenxue Dai; Hari Viswanathan; Alexandra Hakala; Martha Cather; Wei Jia; Yongchao Zhang; Brian McPherson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impact of naturally leaking carbon dioxide on soil properties and ecosystems in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau.

Authors:  Xiaohong Zhao; Hongzhang Deng; Wenke Wang; Feng Han; Chunrong Li; Hui Zhang; Zhenxue Dai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Achieving solubility alteration with functionalized polydimethylsiloxane for improving the viscosity of supercritical CO2 fracturing fluids.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Yanling Wang; Lei Liang; Yijin Zeng
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.036

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.