| Literature DB >> 27362346 |
Petra E Petersen1,2, David J Penman2, Geir Dahle3, Øystein Patursson1, John B Taggart2.
Abstract
Aquaculture production of cod has decreased from over 20,000 tonnes in 2009 to less than 2,000 tonnes in 2014 and the industry faces many challenges, one of which is high and unpredictably variable mortality rates in the early life stages. Hence, full-cycle farming with hatchery produced juveniles is still considered unprofitable compared to fisheries and on-growing of wild cod. In the present study, potential batch differences in progeny survival of wild-caught, hatchery-spawned Faroe Bank cod (Gadus morhua L.) were investigated at two defined periods during early life history; i) the embryo stage (60 day degrees post fertilisation) and ii) the fry stage (110 days post hatch), post metamorphosis. The fry stage experiment was conducted in three replicates (N = 300 per replicate), and a panel of three polymorphic microsatellite markers was used for parental analysis. Mean survival rate at the embryo stage was 69% (± 20% SD). Survival was positively associated with egg diameter (P < 0.01), explaining 90% of the variation in egg survival rates. The data were too scarce to conclude either way concerning a possible correlation between survival rates between the two periods (P < 0.10). Offspring from three batches (from a total of eight) dominated in the fry stage, contributing over 90% of the progeny, and results were consistent over all three replicate tanks. The skewed batch representation observed may be of relevance to the effective management of selective breeding programmes for cod.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27362346 PMCID: PMC4928819 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158091
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Mating design and sizes of pre-spawning parents.
| ID | Length (cm) | Weight (kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 87.5 | 10.3 | 1.54 |
| M1a | 84.0 | 9.3 | 1.57 |
| M1b | 76.0 | 5.5 | 1.25 |
| F2 | 80.5 | 8.9 | 1.71 |
| M2a | 82.0 | 8.6 | 1.56 |
| M2b | 83.0 | 8.5 | 1.49 |
| F3 | 77.5 | 10.2 | 2.19 |
| M3a | 79.0 | 6.5 | 1.32 |
| M3b | 81.0 | 7.0 | 1.32 |
| F4 | 87.0 | 7.5 | 1.14 |
| M4a | 85.0 | 8.9 | 1.45 |
| M4b | 85.0 | 9.0 | 1.46 |
| F5 | 91.5 | 10.6 | 1.38 |
| M5a | 93.0 | 14.4 | 1.79 |
| M5b | 94.0 | 12.5 | 1.50 |
| F6 | 97.0 | 12.7 | 1.39 |
| M6a | 94.5 | 12.9 | 1.53 |
| M6b | 95.0 | 11.0 | 1.28 |
| F7 | 81.5 | 7.2 | 1.33 |
| M7 | 83.0 | 8.9 | 1.56 |
| F8 | 100.5 | 16.0 | 1.58 |
| M8 | 94.5 | 11.4 | 1.35 |
| Female averages | 88 (± 8 SD) | 10.4 (± 2.9 SD) | 1.53 (± 0.32) |
F = female; M = male; K = Fulton´s condition factor calculated as 100,000 × body mass (g) divided by [total length (mm)]3.
*These data were obtained later than the rest, on the day that the fish were introduced into the spawning tanks.
Primer and locus information for the three microsatellite markers used.
| Allele | No. Of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeat | Primer sequence | size | alleles in | |||
| Locus | Motif | (5´→ 3´) | Dye | range (bp) | parental cod | Reference |
| GACA | F: GCA AAA CGA GAT GCA CAG ACA CC | NED | 112–252 | 20 | [ | |
| R: TGG GGG AGG CAT CTG TCA TTC A | ||||||
| GACA | F: CAC AGT GAA GTG AAC CCA CTG | VIC | 122–206 | 15 | [ | |
| R: GTC TTG CCT GTA AGT CAG CTT G | ||||||
| GT | F: TTT CCG ATG AGG TCA TGG | 6-FAM | 78–158 | 18 | [ | |
| R: AAT CCA CTG GTG CAG ACC |
Multiple linear regression analysis of the effect of egg diameter and female condition on survival in the embryo stage (N = 8), multiple r2 = 0.90.
| Coefficient | Standard Error | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -379.24 | 75.03 | -5.06 | <0.01 | |
| 351.62 | 66.39 | 5.30 | <0.01 | |
| -2.18 | 11.46 | -0.19 | 0.86 |
Fig 1Survival numbers of post-metamorphosis progeny per replicate tank.
Black, dark grey and light grey bars represent tank 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
Parental contribution to post-metamorphosis progeny, for the three replicate tanks (where applicable divided into contributions from each of two males; Table 1) and total over all three tanks.
| Female | Replicate | Total per batch | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 1 | 2 | 3 | No. | % | Cumulative (%) |
| F2 | 65/61 | 70/51 | 63/28 | 338 | 37.6 | 37.6 |
| F6 | 91/0 | 92/0 | 80/0 | 263 | 29.3 | 66.9 |
| F3 | 24/40 | 29/41 | 34/50 | 218 | 24.2 | 91.1 |
| F8 | 10 | 7 | 14 | 31 | 3.4 | 94.5 |
| F5 | 0/2 | 1/3 | 1/17 | 24 | 2.7 | 97.2 |
| F1 | 2/3 | 3/0 | 5/5 | 18 | 2 | 99.2 |
| F7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0.7 | 99.9 |
| F4 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
| 300 | 299 | 300 | 899 | 100 | 100 | |
Fig 2Scatterplot of survival in the fry stage versus survival in the embryo stage.
For each observation of embryo survival, there are three replicate observations of fry survival. Labels above indicate batch identity.