Literature DB >> 2736153

A comparison of bone turnover in athymic (nude) and euthymic mice: biochemical, histomorphometric, bone ash and in vitro studies.

L K McCauley1, T J Rosol, C C Capen, J E Horton.   

Abstract

Bone turnover in T-cell deficient mice was investigated by comparing parameters of bone physiology in athymic (nude) and euthymic mice. Static and dynamic bone histomorphometry, serum biochemical assays, body weight and tibia length measurements, and bone ash determination were completed in 6- and 12-wk-old athymic (nude) mice (NIH: Swiss nu/nu) and euthymic mice (nu/+) (10 mice/group). In vitro bone resorbing activity stimulated by parathyroid hormone (PTH) or prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was measured in calvaria of neonatal athymic and euthymic mice. Athymic mice had smaller vertebral tissue area (p less than 0.01), tibia length (p less than 0.001), and less body weight (p less than 0.01) than euthymic mice. The percent double labeled surface (p less than 0.05) and mineralizing perimeter (p less than 0.01) were reduced in athymic as compared to age-matched euthymic mice. Osteoclast number was reduced in the 6-wk athymic mice as compared to 6-wk euthymic mice. Osteoclastic perimeter was reduced in the 12-wk-old mice (athymic and euthymic) as compared to the 6-wk-old mice. Serum calcium was lower at both ages in athymic mice (p less than 0.01) as compared to euthymic mice. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels were reduced (p less than 0.01) in 12-wk-old athymic mice as compared to age-matched euthymic mice, and were greater in 6-wk-old mice than 12-wk-old mice. Athymic mice had greater femur density than euthymic mice (p less than 0.01), and lower (p less than 0.001) percent ash weight of dry bone compared to euthymic mice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2736153     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(89)90144-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  7 in total

1.  Estrogen deficiency induces bone loss by enhancing T-cell production of TNF-alpha.

Authors:  S Cenci; M N Weitzmann; C Roggia; N Namba; D Novack; J Woodring; R Pacifici
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  New bone induction by demineralized bone matrix in immunosuppressed rats.

Authors:  A Marusić; I Dikić; S Vukicević; M Marusić
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1992-08-15

3.  Comments on "cyclosporin does not affect the absolute rate of cortical bone resorption at the organ level in the growing rat".

Authors:  S Epstein; W S Jee; Y Ma; C C Liu
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Mechanisms of bone resorption and new bone formation in spondyloarthropathies.

Authors:  Willis Huang; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Absence of response to human parathyroid hormone in athymic mice grafted with human parathyroid adenoma, hyperplasia or parathyroid cells maintained in culture.

Authors:  B G Hory; M C Roussanne; S Rostand; A Bourdeau; T B Drüeke; J Gogusev
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  A Histomorphometric Analysis of Radiation Damage in an Isogenic Murine Model of Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Alexander R Zheutlin; Sagar S Deshpande; Noah S Nelson; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Jose J Rodriguez; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Differential Bone Loss in Mouse Models of Colon Cancer Cachexia.

Authors:  Andrea Bonetto; Joshua K Kays; Valorie A Parker; Ryan R Matthews; Rafael Barreto; Melissa J Puppa; Kyung S Kang; James A Carson; Theresa A Guise; Khalid S Mohammad; Alexander G Robling; Marion E Couch; Leonidas G Koniaris; Teresa A Zimmers
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.