Literature DB >> 2735875

Usage of statistics in the surgical literature and the 'orphan P' phenomenon.

D Oliver1, J C Hall.   

Abstract

The statistics used in 240 surgical publications were reviewed. Basic parametric statistics were used in 60% of the publications; 21% of publications failed to document a measure of central tendency, 11% of publications contained an undefined '+/-' notation, and 10% of publications did not state the type of evaluative statistic that was used to calculate a P value, that is, an 'orphan P'. These results indicate the need for wider education about the use of descriptive and basic parametric statistics. It is impossible to evaluate the surgical literature critically without these skills.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2735875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  5 in total

1.  Biostatistical resources in an academic medical center.

Authors:  Matthew S Thiese; Andria Thatcher; Melissa Cheng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Misuse of statistics in surgical literature.

Authors:  Matthew S Thiese; Brenden Ronna; Riann B Robbins
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Truths, lies, and statistics.

Authors:  Matthew S Thiese; Skyler Walker; Jenna Lindsey
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  An evaluation of the quality of statistical design and analysis of published medical research: results from a systematic survey of general orthopaedic journals.

Authors:  Nick R Parsons; Charlotte L Price; Richard Hiskens; Juul Achten; Matthew L Costa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Prevalence and Prevention of Reproducibility Deficiencies in Life Sciences Research: Large-Scale Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Nadine M Mansour; E Andrew Balas; Frances M Yang; Marlo M Vernon
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-09-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.