Sarah E Cusick1, Robert O Opoka2, Steven A Abrams3, Chandy C John4, Michael K Georgieff5, Ezekiel Mupere2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN; scusick@umn.edu. 2. Departament of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX; and. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN;
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iron therapy begun concurrently with antimalarial treatment may not be well absorbed because of malaria-induced inflammation. Delaying the start of iron therapy may permit better iron absorption and distribution. OBJECTIVE: We compared erythrocyte iron incorporation in children who started iron supplementation concurrently with antimalarial treatment or 28 d later. We hypothesized that delayed iron supplementation would be associated with greater incorporation and better hematologic recovery. METHODS: We enrolled 100 children aged 6-59 mo with malaria and hemoglobin concentrations of 50.0-99.9 g/L who presented to Mulago Hospital, Kampala, into a randomized trial of iron therapy. All children were administered antimalarial treatment. Children withzinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) ≥80 μmol/mol heme were randomly assigned to start iron supplementation concurrently with the antimalarial treatment [immediate iron (I) group] or 28 d later [delayed iron (D) group]. All children were administered iron-stable isotope (57)Fe on day 0 and (58)Fe on day 28. We compared the percentage of iron incorporation at the start of supplementation (I group at day 0 compared with D group at day 28, aim 1) and hematologic recovery at day 56 (aim 2). RESULTS: The percentage of iron incorporation (mean ± SE) was greater at day 28 in the D group (16.5% ± 1.7%) than at day 0 in the I group (7.9% ± 0.5%; P < 0.001). On day 56, concentrations of hemoglobin and ZPP and plasma ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), hepcidin, and C-reactive protein did not differ between the groups. On day 28, the hemoglobin (mean ± SD) and plasma iron markers (geometric mean; 95% CI) reflected poorer iron status in the D group than in the I group at this intervening time as follows: hemoglobin (105 ± 15.9 compared with 112 ± 12.4 g/L; P = 0.04), ferritin (39.3 μg/L; 23.5, 65.7 μg/L compared with 79.9 μg/L; 58.3, 110 μg/L; P = 0.02), sTfR (8.9 mg/L; 7.4, 10.7 mg/L compared with 6.7 mg/L; 6.1, 7.5 mg/L; P = 0.01), and hepcidin (13.3 ng/mL; 8.3, 21.2 ng/mL compared with 38.8 ng/mL; 28.3, 53.3 ng/mL; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying the start of iron improves incorporation but leads to equivalent hematologic recovery at day 56 in Ugandan children with malaria and anemia. These results do not demonstrate a clear, short-term benefit of delaying iron. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01754701.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Iron therapy begun concurrently with antimalarial treatment may not be well absorbed because of malaria-induced inflammation. Delaying the start of iron therapy may permit better iron absorption and distribution. OBJECTIVE: We compared erythrocyte iron incorporation in children who started iron supplementation concurrently with antimalarial treatment or 28 d later. We hypothesized that delayed iron supplementation would be associated with greater incorporation and better hematologic recovery. METHODS: We enrolled 100 children aged 6-59 mo with malaria and hemoglobin concentrations of 50.0-99.9 g/L who presented to Mulago Hospital, Kampala, into a randomized trial of iron therapy. All children were administered antimalarial treatment. Children with zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) ≥80 μmol/mol heme were randomly assigned to start iron supplementation concurrently with the antimalarial treatment [immediate iron (I) group] or 28 d later [delayed iron (D) group]. All children were administered iron-stable isotope (57)Fe on day 0 and (58)Fe on day 28. We compared the percentage of iron incorporation at the start of supplementation (I group at day 0 compared with D group at day 28, aim 1) and hematologic recovery at day 56 (aim 2). RESULTS: The percentage of iron incorporation (mean ± SE) was greater at day 28 in the D group (16.5% ± 1.7%) than at day 0 in the I group (7.9% ± 0.5%; P < 0.001). On day 56, concentrations of hemoglobin and ZPP and plasma ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), hepcidin, and C-reactive protein did not differ between the groups. On day 28, the hemoglobin (mean ± SD) and plasma iron markers (geometric mean; 95% CI) reflected poorer iron status in the D group than in the I group at this intervening time as follows: hemoglobin (105 ± 15.9 compared with 112 ± 12.4 g/L; P = 0.04), ferritin (39.3 μg/L; 23.5, 65.7 μg/L compared with 79.9 μg/L; 58.3, 110 μg/L; P = 0.02), sTfR (8.9 mg/L; 7.4, 10.7 mg/L compared with 6.7 mg/L; 6.1, 7.5 mg/L; P = 0.01), and hepcidin (13.3 ng/mL; 8.3, 21.2 ng/mL compared with 38.8 ng/mL; 28.3, 53.3 ng/mL; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying the start of iron improves incorporation but leads to equivalent hematologic recovery at day 56 in Ugandan children with malaria and anemia. These results do not demonstrate a clear, short-term benefit of delaying iron. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01754701.
Authors: Quirijn de Mast; Behzad Nadjm; Hugh Reyburn; Erwin H J M Kemna; Ben Amos; Coby M M Laarakkers; Simphorosa Silalye; Hans Verhoef; Robert W Sauerwein; Dorine W Swinkels; Andre J A M van der Ven Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Dominik Glinz; Richard F Hurrell; Aurélie A Righetti; Christophe Zeder; Lukas G Adiossan; Harold Tjalsma; Jürg Utzinger; Michael B Zimmermann; Eliézer K N'Goran; Rita Wegmüller Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Moses Gwamaka; Jonathan D Kurtis; Bess E Sorensen; Sarah Holte; Robert Morrison; Theonest K Mutabingwa; Michal Fried; Patrick E Duffy Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Hans Verhoef; Clive E West; Silas M Nzyuko; Stefan de Vogel; Rikkert van der Valk; Mike A Wanga; Anneleen Kuijsten; Jacobien Veenemans; Frans J Kok Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-09-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrew M Prentice; Conor P Doherty; Steven A Abrams; Sharon E Cox; Sarah H Atkinson; Hans Verhoef; Andrew E Armitage; Hal Drakesmith Journal: Blood Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Conor P Doherty; Sharon E Cox; Antony J Fulford; Steven Austin; David C Hilmers; Steven A Abrams; Andrew M Prentice Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah E Cusick; Robert O Opoka; Andrew S Ssemata; Michael K Georgieff; Chandy C John Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 8.472
Authors: Andrew S Ssemata; Meredith Hickson; John M Ssenkusu; Sarah E Cusick; Noeline Nakasujja; Robert O Opoka; Maria Kroupina; Michael K Georgieff; Paul Bangirana; Chandy C John Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Ericka G Jaramillo; Ezekiel Mupere; Robert O Opoka; James S Hodges; Troy C Lund; Michael K Georgieff; Chandy C John; Sarah E Cusick Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nsengi Y Ntamabyaliro; Christian Burri; Didier B Nzolo; Aline B Engo; Yves N Lula; Samuel M Mampunza; Célestin N Nsibu; Gauthier K Mesia; Jean-Marie N Kayembe; Joris L Likwela; Leon M Kintaudi; Gaston L Tona Journal: Malar J Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 2.979