Literature DB >> 27357131

Prognosis prediction of non-enhancing T2 high signal intensity lesions in glioblastoma patients after standard treatment: application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Rihyeon Kim1, Seung Hong Choi2,3,4,5, Tae Jin Yun1, Soon-Tae Lee6, Chul-Kee Park7, Tae Min Kim8, Ji-Hoon Kim1, Sun-Won Park9, Chul-Ho Sohn1, Sung-Hye Park10, Il Han Kim11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify candidate imaging biomarkers for early disease progression in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients by analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR parameters of non-enhancing T2 high signal intensity (SI) lesions.
METHODS: Forty-nine GBM patients who had undergone preoperative DCE MR imaging and received standard treatment were retrospectively included. According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, patients were classified into progression (n = 21) or non-progression (n = 28) groups. We analysed the pharmacokinetic parameters of Ktrans, Ve and Vp within non-enhancing T2 high SI lesions of each tumour. The best percentiles of each parameter from cumulative histograms were identified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and were compared using multivariate stepwise logistic regression.
RESULTS: For the differentiation of early disease progression, the highest AUC values were found in the 99th percentile of Ktrans (AUC 0.954), the 97th percentile of Ve (AUC 0.815) and the 94th percentile of Vp (AUC 0.786) (all p < 0.05). The 99th percentile of Ktrans was the only significant independent variable from the multivariate stepwise logistic regression (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that the Ktrans of non-enhancing T2 high SI lesions in GBM patients holds potential as a candidate prognostic marker in future prospective studies. KEY POINTS: • DCE MR imaging provides candidate prognostic marker of GBM after standard treatment. • Cumulative histogram was applied to include entire non-enhancing T2 high SI lesions. • The 99th percentile value of Ktrans was the most likely potential biomarker.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiotherapy; Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Glioblastoma; Parameter imaging; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27357131     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4464-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  39 in total

1.  Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

Authors:  P S Tofts; A G Kermode
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  M A Hammoud; R Sawaya; W Shi; P F Thall; N E Leeds
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial.

Authors:  Walter Stummer; Uwe Pichlmeier; Thomas Meinel; Otmar Dieter Wiestler; Friedhelm Zanella; Hans-Jürgen Reulen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Regional variation in histopathologic features of tumor specimens from treatment-naive glioblastoma correlates with anatomic and physiologic MR Imaging.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Joanna J Phillips; Rupa Parvataneni; Annette Molinaro; Emma Essock-Burns; Gabriela Bourne; Andrew T Parsa; Manish K Aghi; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Soonmee Cha; Susan M Chang; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas.

Authors:  Dieta Brandsma; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of DSC- and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Preoperative Grading of Astrocytomas.

Authors:  T B Nguyen; G O Cron; K Perdrizet; K Bezzina; C H Torres; S Chakraborty; J Woulfe; G H Jansen; J Sinclair; R E Thornhill; C Foottit; B Zanette; I G Cameron
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Invasive tumor cells and prognosis in a selected population of patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Annunziato Mangiola; Pasquale de Bonis; Giulio Maira; Mario Balducci; Gigliola Sica; Gina Lama; Libero Lauriola; Carmelo Anile
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model.

Authors:  P S Tofts; B Berkowitz; M D Schnall
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Peritumoral edema shown by MRI predicts poor clinical outcome in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Chen-Xing Wu; Guo-Shi Lin; Zhi-Xiong Lin; Jian-Dong Zhang; Shui-Yuan Liu; Chang-Fu Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.

Authors:  Gian Marco Conte; Antonella Castellano; Luisa Altabella; Antonella Iadanza; Marcello Cadioli; Andrea Falini; Nicoletta Anzalone
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Nonenhancing T2 High-Signal-Intensity Lesions in Baseline and Posttreatment Glioblastoma: Temporal Change and Prognostic Value.

Authors:  I Hwang; S H Choi; C-K Park; T M Kim; S-H Park; J K Won; I H Kim; S-T Lee; R-E Yoo; K M Kang; T J Yun; J-H Kim; C-H Sohn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Prognostic Predictions for Patients with Glioblastoma after Standard Treatment: Application of Contrast Leakage Information from DSC-MRI within Nonenhancing FLAIR High-Signal-Intensity Lesions.

Authors:  S H Kim; K H Cho; S H Choi; T M Kim; C K Park; S H Park; J K Won; I H Kim; S T Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Increasing FLAIR signal intensity in the postoperative cavity predicts progression in gross-total resected high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Guan-Min Quan; Yong-Li Zheng; Tao Yuan; Jian-Ming Lei
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Prediction value of unmeasurable MR enhancement at early stage after gross-total resection on the survival state of patients with high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Guanmin Quan; Yongli Zheng; Jun Chen; Bei Hua; Xiaoli Ji; Kexin Zhang; Duo Gao; Jianming Lei; Tao Yuan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Initial and Recurrent Glioblastoma: Correlation Study with DWI and DSC PWI Features.

Authors:  H J Choi; S H Choi; S-H You; R-E Yoo; K M Kang; T J Yun; J-H Kim; C-H Sohn; C-K Park; S-H Park
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Radiomics-based neural network predicts recurrence patterns in glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ka Young Shim; Sung Won Chung; Jae Hak Jeong; Inpyeong Hwang; Chul-Kee Park; Tae Min Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Jae Kyung Won; Joo Ho Lee; Soon-Tae Lee; Roh-Eul Yoo; Koung Mi Kang; Tae Jin Yun; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Kyu Sung Choi; Seung Hong Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Imaging in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Hari Nandu; Patrick Y Wen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 9.  Clinical Applications of Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI Techniques in Gliomas: Recent Advances and Current Challenges.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhang; Heng Liu; Haipeng Tong; Sumei Wang; Yizeng Yang; Gang Liu; Weiguo Zhang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Prognostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Derived Pharmacokinetic Variables in Glioblastoma Patients: Analysis of Contrast-Enhancing Lesions and Non-Enhancing T2 High-Signal Intensity Lesions.

Authors:  Sun Won Park; Seung Hong Choi; Yeonah Kang; Eun Kyoung Hong; Jung Hyo Rhim; Roh Eul Yoo; Koung Mi Kang; Tae Jin Yun; Ji Hoon Kim; Chul Ho Sohn
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.