Literature DB >> 27356644

[Clinical application of different sedation regimen in patients with septic shock].

F Guo1, Q Wang, C Y Yan, H Y Huang, X Yu, L Y Tu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluated the 3 sedation regimen for patients with septic shock.
METHODS: The randomized controlled trial wan conducted. Forty-five patients with septic shock were assigned to 3 groups (midazolam group, propofol group, and dexmedetomidine group) randomly. The basic characteristics of patients, the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the ICU, the death rate for 28 days and the regulatory cell (Treg) in peripheral blood were observed. The control group for Treg test was consisted of 20 healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in the death rate for 28 days and the duration of mechanical ventilation. The length of stay in the ICU in dexmedetomidine group was shorter than that in midazolam group(15.21±5.55 vs.19.67±5.7 days, P<0.05). The Treg of 3 groups was higher than that of control group (11.82±4.93 vs.3.69±1.71, 11.30±3.42 vs. 3.69±1.71, 12.83±6.17 vs. 3.69±1.71) at the first day of ICU. The Treg after 3 ICU days in dexmedetomidine group and the Treg after 5 ICU days in propofol group and in midazolam group have no difference with control group.
CONCLUSION: For the patients with septic shock, dexmedetomidine could decrease the length of stay in the ICU and the duration of immune suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27356644     DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.22.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 0376-2491


  5 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis comparing dexmedetomidine versus standard of care for sedation in patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Basel Abdelazeem; Bilal Malik; Mohamed M G Mohamed; Pramod Savarapu; Sakiru Isa; Babikir Kheiri; Mustafa Hassan
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-11-08

2.  Dexmedetomidine vs other sedatives in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Fayez Alshamsi; Kallirroi Laiya Carayannopoulos; Anders Granholm; Joshua Piticaru; Kimberley Lewis; Zainab Al Duhailib; Dipayan Chaudhuri; Laura Spatafora; Yuhong Yuan; John Centofanti; Jessica Spence; Bram Rochwerg; Dan Perri; Dale M Needham; Anne Holbrook; John W Devlin; Osamu Nishida; Kimia Honarmand; Begüm Ergan; Eugenia Khorochkov; Pratik Pandharipande; Mohammed Alshahrani; Tim Karachi; Mark Soth; Yahya Shehabi; Morten Hylander Møller; Waleed Alhazzani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 41.787

Review 3.  Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Hua-Ze Ding; Yi-Ling Dong; Kai-Yue Zhang; Jia-Yu Bai
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  The Effect of Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Caimu Wang; Qijiang Chen; Ping Wang; Weisheng Jin; Chao Zhong; Zisheng Ge; Kangmin Xu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-13

5.  Effect of Dexmedetomidine on duration of mechanical ventilation in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peifen Chen; Jihong Jiang; Yunhe Zhang; Guobao Li; Zhihui Qiu; Mitchell M Levy; Baoji Hu
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.317

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.