Literature DB >> 27355896

Choice of osteoblast model critical for studying the effects of electromagnetic stimulation on osteogenesis in vitro.

Anna-Maria Bique1, Emilia Kaivosoja1, Marko Mikkonen1, Mervi Paulasto-Kröckel1.   

Abstract

The clinical benefits of electromagnetic field (EMF) therapy in enhancing osteogenesis have been acknowledged for decades, but agreement regarding the underlying mechanisms continues to be sought. Studies have shown EMFs to promote osteoblast-like cell proliferation, or contrarily, to induce differentiation and enhance mineralization. Typically these disparities have been attributed to methodological differences. The present paper argues the possibility that the chosen osteoblast model impacts stimulation outcome. Phenotypically immature cells, particularly at low seeding densities, appear to be prone to EMF-amplified proliferation. Conversely, mature cells at higher densities seem to be predisposed to earlier onset differentiation and mineralization. This suggests that EMFs augment ongoing processes in cell populations. To test this hypothesis, mature SaOS-2 cells and immature MC3T3-E1 cells at various densities, with or without osteo-induction, were exposed to sinusoidal 50 Hz EMF. The exposure stimulated the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 and inhibited the proliferation of SaOS-2 cells. Baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression of SaOS-2 cells was high and rapidly further increased with EMF exposure, whereas ALP effects in MC3T3-E1 cells were not seen until the second week. Thus both cell types responded differently to EMF stimulation, corroborating the hypothesis that the phenotypic maturity and culture stage of cells influence stimulation outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell proliferation and differentiation; MC3T3-E1 murine osteoblast-like cell line; SaOS-2 osteosarcoma cell line; extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields; osteoblast mineralization; osteoblast phenotype; pulsed electromagnetic fields

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27355896     DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2016.1138124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electromagn Biol Med        ISSN: 1536-8386            Impact factor:   2.882


  5 in total

1.  A novel electron emission-based cell culture device promotes cell proliferation and differentiation of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Fumiaki Sugimori; Hiroyuki Hirakawa; Ai Tsutsui; Hiroyuki Yamaji; Shohei Komaru; Mai Takasaki; Tadashi Iwamatsu; Toshimasa Uemura; Yo Uemura; Kenichi Morita; Takashi Tsumura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Heat treatment dependent cytotoxicity of silicalite-1 films deposited on Ti-6Al-4V alloy evaluated by bone-derived cells.

Authors:  Ivana Nemcakova; Ivan Jirka; Martina Doubkova; Lucie Bacakova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Long-term stimulation with alternating electric fields modulates the differentiation and mineralization of human pre-osteoblasts.

Authors:  Franziska Sahm; Vivica Freiin Grote; Julius Zimmermann; Fiete Haack; Adelinde M Uhrmacher; Ursula van Rienen; Rainer Bader; Rainer Detsch; Anika Jonitz-Heincke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Short Exposures to an Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Field (ELF MF) Enhance Protein but not mRNA Alkaline Phosphatase Expression in Human Osteosarcoma Cells.

Authors:  Tania Rescigno; Anna Capasso; Bruno Bisceglia; Mario Felice Tecce
Journal:  Open Biochem J       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 5.  Translational Insights into Extremely Low Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (ELF-PEMFs) for Bone Regeneration after Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Sabrina Ehnert; Steffen Schröter; Romina H Aspera-Werz; Wiebke Eisler; Karsten Falldorf; Michael Ronniger; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.