Erin R Wallace1, Brent R Collett, Kathleen Kapp-Simon, Jacqueline R Starr, Craig Birgfeld, Matthew L Speltz. 1. *Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA; †Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; ‡Cleft-Craniofacial Center, Shriner's Hospital for Children, Chicago, IL; §Craniofacial Center, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL; ‖Department of Clinical and Translational Research, The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, MA; ¶Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA; **Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that infants and young children with single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) perform more poorly on tests of visuomotor function than children without SSC. However, previous studies are limited by small sample sizes and little is known about the persistence of visuomotor problems into the school-age years. The aim of this study was to compare visuomotor function in children with and without SSC at the beginning of elementary school. METHODS: The study included 179 children with SSC (cases) and 183 children without SSC (controls). Visuomotor function was measured by the NEPSY-II Arrows, the Purdue Pegboard Test, and the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of visual-motor integration. Case-control differences were estimated using linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and maternal IQ. RESULTS: Cases scored more poorly on all measures of visuomotor function, although the magnitude of case-control differences varied across measures. The greatest differences were observed for the Purdue Pegboard Test, with an average adjusted difference of -0.2 to -0.4 SD points (p-values ranged from .008 to .05). Case-control differences were small in magnitude for other measures of visuomotor function, ranging from -0.01 to -0.1 SD points (p-values ranged from .22 to .88). CONCLUSION: Children with SSC experienced deficits in manual dexterity into the school-age years but were similar to children without SSC on measures of visual processing. These findings advocate for the assessment of fine-motor function as part of school readiness evaluations in children with SSC.
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that infants and young children with single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) perform more poorly on tests of visuomotor function than children without SSC. However, previous studies are limited by small sample sizes and little is known about the persistence of visuomotor problems into the school-age years. The aim of this study was to compare visuomotor function in children with and without SSC at the beginning of elementary school. METHODS: The study included 179 children with SSC (cases) and 183 children without SSC (controls). Visuomotor function was measured by the NEPSY-II Arrows, the Purdue Pegboard Test, and the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of visual-motor integration. Case-control differences were estimated using linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and maternal IQ. RESULTS: Cases scored more poorly on all measures of visuomotor function, although the magnitude of case-control differences varied across measures. The greatest differences were observed for the Purdue Pegboard Test, with an average adjusted difference of -0.2 to -0.4 SD points (p-values ranged from .008 to .05). Case-control differences were small in magnitude for other measures of visuomotor function, ranging from -0.01 to -0.1 SD points (p-values ranged from .22 to .88). CONCLUSION:Children with SSC experienced deficits in manual dexterity into the school-age years but were similar to children without SSC on measures of visual processing. These findings advocate for the assessment of fine-motor function as part of school readiness evaluations in children with SSC.
Authors: Jacqueline R Starr; Brent R Collett; Rebecca Gaither; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Michael L Cunningham; Matthew L Speltz Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2012-06-01
Authors: Matthew L Speltz; Brent R Collett; Erin R Wallace; Jacqueline R Starr; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Lauren Buono; Michael Cunningham; Kathleen Kapp-Simon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Brent R Collett; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Erin Wallace; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Lauren Buono; Matthew L Speltz Journal: Child Neuropsychol Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: G Vasco; G Baranello; D Ricci; A Salerni; G Tamburrini; R Amante; A Dickmann; C Di Rocco; F Velardi; E Mercuri Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 3.791