Literature DB >> 27355773

Cognitive Spare Capacity as an Index of Listening Effort.

Mary Rudner1.   

Abstract

Everyday listening may be experienced as effortful, especially by individuals with hearing loss. This may be due to internal factors, such as cognitive load, and external factors, such as noise. Even when speech is audible, internal and external factors may combine to reduce cognitive spare capacity, or the ability to engage in cognitive processing of spoken information. A better understanding of cognitive spare capacity and how it can be optimally allocated may guide new approaches to rehabilitation and ultimately improve outcomes. This article presents results of three tests of cognitive spare capacity:1. Sentence-final Word Identification and Recall (SWIR) test2. Cognitive Spare Capacity Test (CSCT)3. Auditory Inference Span Test (AIST)Results show that noise reduces cognitive spare capacity even when speech intelligibility is retained. In addition, SWIR results show that hearing aid signal processing can increase cognitive spare capacity, and CSCT and AIST results show that increasing load reduces cognitive spare capacity. Correlational evidence suggests that while the effect of noise on cognitive spare capacity is related to working memory capacity, the effect of load is related to executive function. Future studies should continue to investigate how hearing aid signal processing can mitigate the effect of load on cognitive spare capacity, and whether such effects can be enhanced by developing executive skills through training. The mechanisms modulating cognitive spare capacity should be investigated by studying their neural correlates, and tests of cognitive spare capacity should be developed for clinical use in conjunction with developing new approaches to rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27355773     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

1.  Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; Larry E Humes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The Effects of Switching Non-Spatial Attention During Conversational Turn Taking.

Authors:  Gaven Lin; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Dual-Task Accuracy and Response Time Index Effects of Spoken Sentence Predictability and Cognitive Load on Listening Effort.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 5.  Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures.

Authors:  Katie Neal; Catherine M McMahon; Sarah E Hughes; Isabelle Boisvert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-10

6.  Selected Cognitive Factors Associated with Individual Variability in Clinical Measures of Speech Recognition in Noise Amplified by Fast-Acting Compression Among Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Wycliffe K Yumba
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Subong Kim; Inyong Choi; Adam T Schwalje; KyooSang Kim; Jae Hee Lee
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Neuroanatomical changes associated with age-related hearing loss and listening effort.

Authors:  Stephanie Rosemann; Christiane M Thiel
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.270

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.