Literature DB >> 27355764

Using Speech Recall in Hearing Aid Fitting and Outcome Evaluation Under Ecological Test Conditions.

Thomas Lunner1, Mary Rudner, Tove Rosenbom, Jessica Ågren, Elaine Hoi Ning Ng.   

Abstract

In adaptive Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) tests used in the audiological clinic, speech is presented at signal to noise ratios (SNRs) that are lower than those generally encountered in real-life communication situations. At higher, ecologically valid SNRs, however, SRTs are insensitive to changes in hearing aid signal processing that may be of benefit to listeners who are hard of hearing. Previous studies conducted in Swedish using the Sentence-final Word Identification and Recall test (SWIR) have indicated that at such SNRs, the ability to recall spoken words may be a more informative measure. In the present study, a Danish version of SWIR, known as the Sentence-final Word Identification and Recall Test in a New Language (SWIRL) was introduced and evaluated in two experiments. The objective of experiment 1 was to determine if the Swedish results demonstrating benefit from noise reduction signal processing for hearing aid wearers could be replicated in 25 Danish participants with mild to moderate symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss. The objective of experiment 2 was to compare direct-drive and skin-drive transmission in 16 Danish users of bone-anchored hearing aids with conductive hearing loss or mixed sensorineural and conductive hearing loss. In experiment 1, performance on SWIRL improved when hearing aid noise reduction was used, replicating the Swedish results and generalizing them across languages. In experiment 2, performance on SWIRL was better for direct-drive compared with skin-drive transmission conditions. These findings indicate that spoken word recall can be used to identify benefits from hearing aid signal processing at ecologically valid, positive SNRs where SRTs are insensitive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27355764     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  10 in total

1.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.

Authors:  James Shehorn; Nicole Marrone; Thomas Muller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Postoperative Benefit of Bone Anchored Hearing Systems: Behavioral Performance and Self-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Domenico Cuda; Alessandra Murri; Paolo Mochi; Anna Mainardi
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-19

4.  Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Helén Lagerkvist; Karin Carvalho; Marcus Holmberg; Ulrika Petersson; Cor Cremers; Malou Hultcrantz
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.

Authors:  Andreea Micula; Jerker Rönnberg; Lorenz Fiedler; Dorothea Wendt; Maria Cecilie Jørgensen; Ditte Katrine Larsen; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  A decrease in physiological arousal accompanied by stable behavioral performance reflects task habituation.

Authors:  Andreea Micula; Jerker Rönnberg; Yue Zhang; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  The Effects of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Noise on Conversational Dynamics Between Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Talkers.

Authors:  Eline Borch Petersen; Ewen N MacDonald; A Josefine Munch Sørensen
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

8.  Selected Cognitive Factors Associated with Individual Variability in Clinical Measures of Speech Recognition in Noise Amplified by Fast-Acting Compression Among Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Wycliffe K Yumba
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Subong Kim; Inyong Choi; Adam T Schwalje; KyooSang Kim; Jae Hee Lee
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Three New Outcome Measures That Tap Into Cognitive Processes Required for Real-Life Communication.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner; Emina Alickovic; Carina Graversen; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Dorothea Wendt; Gitte Keidser
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.