| Literature DB >> 27355589 |
Céline Renoux1,2,3, Marc Romana4,3, Philippe Joly1,2,3, Séverine Ferdinand4,3, Camille Faes2,3, Nathalie Lemonne5, Sarah Skinner2,3, Nathalie Garnier6, Maryse Etienne-Julan5, Yves Bertrand6, Marie Petras5, Giovanna Cannas7, Lydia Divialle-Doumdo5, Elie Nader2,3, Daniela Cuzzubbo6, Yann Lamarre4,3, Alexandra Gauthier6, Xavier Waltz4,3, Kamila Kebaili6, Cyril Martin2,3, Arnaud Hot7, Marie-Dominique Hardy-Dessources4,3, Vincent Pialoux2,7,3, Philippe Connes2,4,3,8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Blood rheology plays a key role in the pathophysiology of sickle cell anaemia (SS) and sickle cell haemoglobin C disease (SC), but its evolution over the lifespan is unknown.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27355589 PMCID: PMC4927160 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 11A) Comparisons of foetal haemoglobin (HbF) between SS and SC patients at different age categories; 1B) Comparisons of haematocrit between controls (AA), SS and SC patients at different age categories; 1C) Comparisons of blood viscosity between AA, SS and SC patients at different age categories. aBlood viscosity values from Mackintosh et al [22]; 1D) Comparisons of RBC deformability measured at 3 Pa between AA, SS and SC patients at different age categories. bcRBC deformability values from Gurses et al [21] and Tancer-Elci et al [23]; 1E) Comparisons of RBC deformability measured at 30 Pa between AA, SS and SC patients at different age categories. bcRBC deformability values from Gurses et al [21] and Tancer-Elci et al [23]; 1F) Comparisons of RBC aggregates strength between AA, SS and SC patients at different age categories. Difference between SS and SC (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001), SS and AA (£p < 0.05; £££p < 0.001), SC and AA ($$p < 0.01; $$$p < 0.001).
Effects of gender on haemorheological parameters in SS and SC patients.
| SS | SC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males (n = 122) | Females (n = 145) | Males (n = 67) | Females (n = 71) | |
| HbF (%) | 7.5 ± 6.4 | 13.2 ± 11.8 | 2.7 ± 3.1 | 3.1 ± 5.1 |
| Hydroxycarbamide treatment (%) | 25.6 | 23.6 | 0 | 0 |
| Haematocrit | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.02 |
| Blood viscosity (cP) | 5.15 ± 1.32 | 5.34 ± 1.37 | 6.64 ± 1.40 | 6.94 ± 1.30 |
| RBC deformability (3 Pa, a.u.) | 0.18 ± 0.08 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.04 |
| RBC deformability (30 Pa, a.u.) | 0.38 ± 0.12 | 0.43 ± 0.10 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.07 |
| RBC aggregates strength (s-1) | 303 ± 155 | 274 ± 136 | 298 ± 143 | 288 ± 108 |
Means ± SD. HbF, foetal haemoglobin. Significant difference between Males and Females:
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001
Effects of hydroxycarbamide on haemorheological parameters in SS patients older than 10 yrs old.
| SS after 10 yrs old | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxycarbamide + (n = 49) | Hydroxycarbamide − (n = 128) | |
| HbF (%) | 10.3 ± 7.2 | 7.8 ± 5.9 |
| Haematocrit | 0.24 ± 0.06 | 0.23 ± 0.04 |
| Blood viscosity (cP) | 4.91 ± 1.07 | 5.77 ± 1.26 |
| RBC deformability (3 Pa, a.u.) | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.17 ± 0.06 |
| RBC deformability (30 Pa, a.u.) | 0.42 ± 0.10 | 0.37 ± 0.10 |
| RBC aggregates strength (s-1) | 287 ± 157 | 289 ± 130 |
Means ± SD. HbF, foetal haemoglobin. Significant difference:
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001