| Literature DB >> 27355060 |
Esat Korgali1, Gokce Dundar1, Kubra Acikalin Coskun2, Melih Akyol3, Yusuf Tutar4, Semih Ayan1, Gokhan Gokce1, Emin Yener Gultekin1.
Abstract
Introduction. Strontium salts are anti-irritants for chemically induced sensory irritation. Interstitial cystitis is a painful disease without definitive therapy. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of strontium in bladder with experimental interstitial cystitis model. Material and Methods. Rats' bladders in control group were instilled with NaCl. Second group was instilled with E. coli LPS. Third group was instilled with strontium. Fourth group was initially instilled with strontium and then LPS. Fifth group was instilled with LPS initially and then strontium. Urine of rats was collected at the beginning and end of the study. Results. Histamine and TNF-α changes were statistically significant in the second group but were not significant in the third group. When we compared the histamine levels of second via fourth and fifth groups the changes were statistically not significant. When we compared the TNF-α levels of second via fourth and fifth groups the changes were statistically significant. Conclusions. In our model, strontium did not make any significant changes in histopathology or histamine levels; however, it significantly reduced the levels of TNF-α. Given the role of TNF-α in the physiopathology of interstitial cystitis, these results suggested that further studies are required to evaluate the potential use of strontium in the management of interstitial cystitis.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 27355060 PMCID: PMC4897514 DOI: 10.1155/2014/369292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Sch Res Notices ISSN: 2356-7872
Figure 1Flow chart of the study.
Figure 2Comparison of first day histamine and TNF-α values between all groups.
The changes of histamine and TNF-α levels in second (LPS) and third (strontium) groups.
| Mean ± SD at the beginning (on day 1) | Mean ± SD at the end (on day 7) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Second group histamine | 9.85 ± 3.58 ng/mL | 34.14 ± 3.02 ng/mL | <0.001 |
| Second group TNF- | 6.9 ± 0.9 pg/mL | 119.2 ± 13.5 pg/mL | <0.001 |
| Third group histamine | 9.76 ± 3.61 ng/mL | 11.33 ± 2.57 ng/mL | 0.995 |
| Third group TNF- | 4.3 ± 2.1 pg/mL | 27.8 ± 14.1 pg/mL | 0.102 |
Comparison of end study histamine values of second (LPS) group with those of fourth (preventive) and fifth (treatment) groups.
| Second (LPS) group histamine value on day 7 | Fourth (preventive) group histamine value on day 7 |
|
| 31.88 ± 2.58 ng/mL | 0.942 | |
| Fifth (treatment) group histamine value on day 7 |
| |
| 37.28 ± 4.16 ng/mL | 0.702 |
Comparison of end study TNF-α values of second (LPS) group with those of fourth (preventive) and fifth (treatment) groups.
| Second (LPS) group TNF- | Fourth (preventive) group TNF- |
|
| 28.0 ± 15.1 pg/mL | <0.001 | |
| Fifth (treatment) group TNF- |
| |
| 25.0 ± 14.6 pg/mL | <0.001 |
Figure 3Histologic view of bladders with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining protocol in all groups.