| Literature DB >> 27355021 |
Sateesh Kumar Vemula1, Mohan Vangala2.
Abstract
The intention of present research is to formulate and develop the meclizine hydrochloride fast dissolving tablets using sublimation method to enhance the dissolution rate. In this study an attempt was made to fasten the drug release from the oral tablets by incorporating the superdisintegrants and camphor as sublimating agent. The prepared fast dissolving tablets were subjected to precompression properties and characterized for hardness, weight variation, friability, wetting time, water absorption ratio, and disintegration time. From in vitro release studies, the formulation F9 exhibited fast release profile of about 98.61% in 30 min, and disintegration time 47 sec when compared with other formulations. The percent drug release in 30 min (Q 30) and initial dissolution rate for formulation F9 was 98.61 ± 0.25%, 3.29%/min. These were very much higher compared to marketed tablets (65.43 ± 0.57%, 2.18%/min). The dissolution efficiency was found to be 63.37 and it is increased by 1.4-fold with F9 FDT tablets compared to marketed tablets. Differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies revealed that there was no possibility of interactions. Thus the development of meclizine hydrochloride fast dissolving tablets by sublimation method is a suitable approach to improve the dissolution rate.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 27355021 PMCID: PMC4897533 DOI: 10.1155/2014/281376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Sch Res Notices ISSN: 2356-7872
Formulations of meclizine hydrochloride FDTs by sublimation method.
| Ingredients (mg) | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meclizine HCl | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Sodium starch glycolate | 2 | 4 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Croscarmelose sodium | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | — | — | — |
| Crospovidone | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Camphor | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 59 | 57 | 55 | 59 | 57 | 55 | 59 | 57 | 55 |
| Aspartame | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Magnesium stearate | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Talc | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
| |||||||||
| Total tablet weight | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Powder characterization of formulation blend.
| Formulation | Bulk density (g/cc) | Tapped density (g/cc) | Angle of repose (°) | Carr's index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 0.362 | 0.485 | 40.61 | 25.36 |
| F2 | 0.381 | 0.538 | 48.42 | 28.30 |
| F3 | 0.385 | 0.545 | 41.52 | 31.25 |
| F4 | 0.410 | 0.475 | 31.20 | 18.47 |
| F5 | 0.427 | 0.462 | 33.39 | 22.36 |
| F6 | 0.419 | 0.493 | 37.41 | 24.74 |
| F7 | 0.394 | 0.456 | 29.56 | 11.54 |
| F8 | 0.424 | 0.477 | 31.25 | 12.24 |
| F9 | 0.422 | 0.471 | 34.22 | 12.35 |
Evaluation of fast dissolving tablets prepared by sublimation method.
| Formulation | Weight variation (mg)∗ | Hardness (kg/cm2)∗∗ | Friability (%)∗∗∗ | Disintegration time (sec)∗∗∗ | Water absorption ratio∗∗∗ | Wetting time (sec)∗∗∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 99 ± 0.99 | 3.47 ± 0.21 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 61 ± 3.0 | 147 ± 1.22 | 139 ± 3.5 |
| F2 | 100 ± 1.10 | 3.32 ± 0.17 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 58 ± 2.0 | 166 ± 1.45 | 133 ± 3.2 |
| F3 | 101 ± 0.84 | 3.45 ± 0.08 | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 55 ± 1.5 | 135 ± 1.87 | 146 ± 2.6 |
| F4 | 98 ± 1.37 | 3.50 ± 0.07 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 56 ± 3.0 | 156 ± 1.32 | 140 ± 2.0 |
| F5 | 101 ± 1.52 | 3.58 ± 0.11 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 59 ± 1.5 | 202 ± 0.25 | 138 ± 2.0 |
| F6 | 100 ± 1.15 | 3.36 ± 0.13 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 54 ± 2.6 | 156 ± 1.75 | 137 ± 4.1 |
| F7 | 99 ± 0.99 | 3.20 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 55 ± 4.3 | 166 ± 2.17 | 133 ± 4.3 |
| F8 | 101 ± 1.56 | 3.37 ± 0.16 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 55 ± 2.0 | 166 ± 1.45 | 134 ± 2.0 |
| F9 | 100 ± 1.21 | 3.28 ± 0.08 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 47 ± 2.5 | 203 ± 1.32 | 122 ± 2.5 |
*All values represent mean ± standard deviation, n = 20; ∗∗all values represent mean ± standard deviation, n = 6; ∗∗∗all values represent mean ± standard deviation, n = 3.
Figure 1Release profile of MCZ from sublimated fast dissolving tablets (n = 3).
Figure 2Comparison of MCZ release from F9 sublimated fast dissolving tablets and marketed tablets (n = 3).
Dissolution parameters of MCZ F9 and marketed tablets (Mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Formulation | ( | IDR (%/min) | DE | RDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F9 tablet | 98.61 ± 0.25 | 3.29 | 63.37 | 1.51 |
| Marketed tablet | 65.43 ± 0.57 | 2.18 | 45.53 |
Figure 3DSC thermograms of MCZ, camphor, and F9 formulation.
Figure 4Fourier transform infrared spectra of MCZ, camphor, and F9 formulation.
FTIR graph interpretation of pure MCZ and camphor.
| Pure MCZ FTIR graph interpretation | Camphor FTIR graph interpretation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region in cm−1 | Type of vibration | Functional group present | Region in cm−1 | Type of vibration | Functional group present |
| ~2400–2500 | NH3 stretch | Ammonium ion | 2957 | CH3 stretch | Methyl |
| 1475 | C=C stretch | Aromatic (unsaturated) | 1448 | CH3 bending | Methyl |
| 1450 | CH3 stretch | Methyl | 1738 | C=O stretch | Ketone |
| 1901 | C–N stretch | Nitrile | |||
| 698 | C–Cl stretch | Carbon-chlorine | |||
Stability studies of MCZ F9 fast dissolving tablets (n = 3).
| Time (min) | Before storage | After 6 months storage |
| Similarity factor (F2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | Not significant | 79.16 |
| 5 | 25.67 ± 0.41 | 23.18 ± 0.93 | ||
| 10 | 43.71 ± 0.52 | 41.63 ± 0.18 | ||
| 15 | 81.45 ± 0.32 | 78.36 ± 0.75 | ||
| 30 | 98.61 ± 0.25 | 96.82 ± 0.34 | ||
|
| 99.94 ± 1.24 | 98.64 ± 1.18 | Not significant | — |