| Literature DB >> 27355020 |
Revathi Ethiraj1, Ethiraj Thiruvengadam2, Venkattapuram Saravanan Sampath1, Abdul Vahid1, Jithin Raj1.
Abstract
A simple, selective, and stability indicating spectroscopic method has been selected and validated for the assay of ceftriaxone sodium in the powder for injection dosage forms. Proposed method is based on the measurement of absorbance of ceftriaxone sodium in aqueous medium at 241 nm. The method obeys Beer's law in the range of 5-50 μg/mL with correlation coefficient of 0.9983. Apparent molar absorptivity and Sandell's sensitivity were found to be 2.046 × 10(3) L mol(-1) cm(-1) and 0.02732 μg/cm(2)/0.001 absorbance units. This study indicated that ceftriaxone sodium was degraded in acid medium and also underwent oxidative degradation. Percent relative standard deviation associated with all the validation parameters was less than 2, showing compliance with acceptance criteria of Q2 (R1), International Conference on Harmonization (2005) guidelines. Then the proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of ceftriaxone sodium in sterile preparation and results were comparable with reported methods.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 27355020 PMCID: PMC4897461 DOI: 10.1155/2014/278173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Sch Res Notices ISSN: 2356-7872
Figure 1Chemical structure of ceftriaxone sodium.
Figure 2Overlay spectrum for ceftriaxone sodium (λ max at 241 nm).
Figure 3Calibration curve for ceftriaxone sodium.
Linearity data of developed method.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
|
| 241 |
| Linearity range ( | 5–50 |
| LOD ( | 0.0332 |
| LOQ ( | 0.1008 |
| Molar absorptivity (L mol−1cm−1) | 2.046 × 103 |
| Sandell's sensitivity ( | 0.02732 |
| Slope | 0.03576 |
| Standard error on slope | 0.0007346 |
| Confidence limit of slope (95%) | 0.03387–0.03765 |
| Intercept | 0.01246 |
| Standard error on intercept | 0.02064 |
| Confidence limit of intercept (95%) | 0.04060–0.06551 |
| Correlation coefficient | 0.9979 |
| Standard deviation of residuals | 0.03360 |
Interday and intraday accuracy and precision study data.
| Level of standard drug added | Interday | Intraday | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean % recovery∗ | % RSD∗ | S.E | 95% CI | Mean % recovery∗ | % RSD∗ | S.E | 95% CI | |
| 10% | 101.10 | 0.69 | 0.4041 | 99.36–102.84 | 100.27 | 0.50 | 0.2906 | 99.01–101.52 |
| 20% | 100.97 | 1.18 | 0.6984 | 99.60–101.90 | 99.23 | 0.20 | 0.1202 | 98.71–99.75 |
| 30% | 100.43 | 1.10 | 0.6386 | 97.68–103.18 | 100.6 | 0.39 | 0.2309 | 99.60–101.59 |
*(n = 6); % RSD: percentage relative standard deviation; S.E: standard error; 95% CI: 95 percent confidence interval.
Data for robustness of the method.
| Parameters | Mean % content | % RSD |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | ||
| at 20°C | 99.72 | 1.1055 |
| at 30°C | 100.49 | 1.7369 |
| Time | ||
| after 1 hr | 101.74 | 1.0835 |
| after 6 hr | 100.23 | 1.7414 |
Statistical comparison of proposed method with reference method.
| Brand name | % RSD for % content∗ | Statistical data | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed method | Reference method | Variance-ratio | Student's | |
| Cefaxone | 0.893 | 0.672 | 1.748 | 0.8819 |
| Cadiceft | 0.435 | 0.555 | 1.574 | 2.215 |
| Monocef | 1.057 | 0.468 | 5.098 | 0.1255 |
(* n = 3).
Results for stability of drug under forced degradation study.
| Parameters studied | Conc. taken ( | Conc. found ( | % degradation | % recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acid hydrolysis | 20 | 7.80 | 11.0 | 89.0% |
| Alkaline hydrolysis | 20 | 20.07 | −0.35 | 100.35% |
| Oxidative degradation | 20 | 18.41 | 7.95 | 92.05% |
| UV degradation | 20 | 21.69 | −8.45 | 108.45% |
| Thermal degradation | 20 | 19.31 | 3.45 | 96.55% |