Literature DB >> 2735473

Containing mental health treatment costs through program design: a Massachusetts study.

B Dickey1, P R Binner, S Leff, M K Uyeda, M J Schlesinger, J E Gudeman.   

Abstract

A single site pre-post study of seriously mentally ill patients treated in a public mental health system shows that annual treatment costs can be substantially reduced with the use of day hospital treatment. Two cohorts of psychiatric patients--282 consecutive admissions to a traditional public inpatient unit in 1980, and 340 consecutive admissions to a combination of inpatient and day hospital care in 1984--were followed 12 months after admission. The substitution of the day hospital is made possible because the facility provided a dormitory residence for those who could not go home at night. Cost savings per hospital episode are about 31 per cent when the additional costs of day hospital and residence are considered. Cost shifting from inpatient to residential sites is noted, but overall mean annual costs, when all other treatment (including additional admissions), residential and family costs were included, are reduced. Readmission rates did not rise. The generalizability of the findings is limited to public mental health centers and state hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2735473      PMCID: PMC1349667          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.7.863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  Brief hospitalization of patients with families: initial results.

Authors:  M I Herz; J Endicott; R L Spitzer
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  DRGs are not enough.

Authors:  H S Leff; V J Bradley
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1986-01

3.  Alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization. Why has research failed to be translated into practice?

Authors:  L R Mosher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Alternative to mental hospital treatment. II. Economic benefit-cost analysis.

Authors:  B A Weisbrod; M A Test; L I Stein
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1980-04

5.  Day hospitalization and an inn instead of inpatient care for psychiatric patients.

Authors:  J E Gudeman; M F Shore; B Dickey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Medicaid cutbacks and block grants: crisis or opportunity for community mental health?

Authors:  S S Sharfstein
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Four-year assessment of a day hospital-inn program as an alternative to inpatient hospitalization.

Authors:  J E Gudeman; B Dickey; A Evans; M F Shore
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Mental health cost models. Refinements and applications.

Authors:  B Dickey; T G McGuire; N L Cannon; J E Gudeman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Length of stay of psychiatric patients. A critical review and discussion.

Authors:  L A Kirshner
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.254

10.  Community residential treatment for schizophrenia: two-year follow-up.

Authors:  L R Mosher; A Z Menn
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1978-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Organizational determinants of efficiency and effectiveness in mental health partial care programs.

Authors:  A P Schinnar; E Kamis-Gould; N Delucia; A B Rothbard
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  The burden of schizophrenia on caregivers: a review.

Authors:  A George Awad; Lakshmi N P Voruganti
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.