| Literature DB >> 27354552 |
Amy Y Li1, Christopher P Filson2, John M Hollingsworth1, Chang He1, Alon Z Weizer1, Brent K Hollenbeck1, Scott M Gilbert3, Khaled S Hafez1, Cheryl T Lee1, Rodney L Dunn1, Jeffrey S Montgomery4.
Abstract
Background Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is gaining traction as a surgical approach, but there are limited data on patient-reported outcomes for this technique compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Objective To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and short-term convalescence among bladder cancer patients who underwent ORC and RARC. Methods Review of a single-institution bladder cancer database was conducted. Baseline and postoperative HRQoL was evaluated using the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) for 324 patients who had ORC (n = 267) or RARC (n = 57) between 2008 and 2012. The BCI assesses function and bother in urinary, bowel, and sexual domains. Among 87 distinct patients (ORC n = 67, RARC n = 20), we also evaluated short-term postoperative convalescence using the Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE) questionnaire. Our primary outcomes were HRQoL within 12 months and short-term convalescence within 6 weeks following cystectomy. We fit generalized estimating equation regression models to estimate longitudinal changes in BCI scores within domains, and CARE domain score differences were tested with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results Clinical characteristics and baseline BCI/CARE scores were similar between the 2 groups (all P > .05). Within 1 year after surgery, recovery of HRQoL across all BCI domains was comparable, with scores nearly returning to baseline at 1 year for all patients. CARE scores at 4 weeks revealed that patients treated with ORC had better pain (29.1 vs 20.0, P = .02) domain scores compared to RARC. These differences abated by week 6. Conclusions HRQoL recovery and short-term convalescence were similar in this cohort following ORC and RARC.Entities:
Keywords: evidence-based medicine/surgery; robotic surgery; urology
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27354552 DOI: 10.1177/1553350616656284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Innov ISSN: 1553-3506 Impact factor: 2.058