| Literature DB >> 27354248 |
Kristin Voigt1,2.
Abstract
Incentive schemes, which offer recipients benefits if they meet particular requirements, are being used across the world to encourage healthier behaviours. From the perspective of equality, an important concern about such schemes is that since people often do not have equal opportunity to fulfil the stipulated conditions, incentives create opportunity for further unfair advantage. Are incentive schemes that are available only to disadvantaged groups less susceptible to such egalitarian concerns? While targeted schemes may at first glance seem well placed to help improve outcomes among disadvantaged groups and thus reduce inequalities, I argue in this paper that they are susceptible to significant problems. At the same time, incentive schemes may be less problematic when they operate in ways that differ from the 'standard' incentive mechanism; I discuss three such mechanisms. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.Entities:
Keywords: Distributive Justice; Health Promotion; Public Health Ethics; Public Policy
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27354248 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903