Rolake O Alabi1, Krzysztof Glomski1, Coline Haxaire1, Gisela Weskamp1, Sébastien Monette1, Carl P Blobel2. 1. From the Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY (R.O.A., K.G., C.H., G.W., C.P.B.); Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY (R.O.A., K.G., C.P.B.); Tri-Institutional Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (S.M.); Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (C.P.B.); and Departments of Medicine and of Physiology, Systems Biology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (C.P.B.). 2. From the Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY (R.O.A., K.G., C.H., G.W., C.P.B.); Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY (R.O.A., K.G., C.P.B.); Tri-Institutional Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, Rockefeller University, New York, NY (S.M.); Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (C.P.B.); and Departments of Medicine and of Physiology, Systems Biology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (C.P.B.). blobelc@hss.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Endothelial Notch signaling is critical for early vascular development and survival. Yet, previously described mice lacking endothelial a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10), a key regulator of Notch signaling, survived into adulthood with organ-specific vascular defects. These findings raised questions about whether these vascular defects were related to Notch signaling or other functions of ADAM10. OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study are to determine whether compensatory or redundant functions of ADAM17 in Notch signaling can explain the survival of Adam10ΔEC mice, explore the contribution of different Tie2-Cre transgenes to the differences in survival, and establish whether the Adam10ΔEC vascular phenotypes can be recapitulated by inactivation of Notch receptors in endothelial cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mice lacking ADAM10 and ADAM17 in endothelial cells (Adam10/Adam17ΔEC), which survived postnatally with organ-specific vascular defects, resembled Adam10ΔEC mice. In contrast, Adam10ΔEC mice generated with the Tie2Cre transgene previously used to inactivate endothelial Notch (Adam10ΔEC(Flv)) died by E10.5. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated that Cre-mediated recombination occurs earlier in Adam10ΔEC(Flv) mice than in the previously described Adam10ΔEC mice. Finally, mice lacking endothelial Notch1 (Notch1ΔEC) share some organ-specific vascular defects with Adam10ΔEC mice, whereas Notch4(-/-) mice lacking endothelial Notch1 (Notch1ΔEC/Notch4(-/-)) had defects in all vascular beds affected in Adam10ΔEC mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our results argue against a major role for ADAM17 in endothelial Notch signaling and clarify the difference in phenotypes of previously described mice lacking ADAM10 or Notch in endothelial cells. Most notably, these findings uncover new roles for Notch signaling in the development of organ-specific vascular beds.
RATIONALE: Endothelial Notch signaling is critical for early vascular development and survival. Yet, previously described mice lacking endothelial a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10), a key regulator of Notch signaling, survived into adulthood with organ-specific vascular defects. These findings raised questions about whether these vascular defects were related to Notch signaling or other functions of ADAM10. OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study are to determine whether compensatory or redundant functions of ADAM17 in Notch signaling can explain the survival of Adam10ΔEC mice, explore the contribution of different Tie2-Cre transgenes to the differences in survival, and establish whether the Adam10ΔEC vascular phenotypes can be recapitulated by inactivation of Notch receptors in endothelial cells. METHODS AND RESULTS:Mice lacking ADAM10 and ADAM17 in endothelial cells (Adam10/Adam17ΔEC), which survived postnatally with organ-specific vascular defects, resembled Adam10ΔEC mice. In contrast, Adam10ΔEC mice generated with the Tie2Cre transgene previously used to inactivate endothelial Notch (Adam10ΔEC(Flv)) died by E10.5. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated that Cre-mediated recombination occurs earlier in Adam10ΔEC(Flv) mice than in the previously described Adam10ΔEC mice. Finally, mice lacking endothelial Notch1 (Notch1ΔEC) share some organ-specific vascular defects with Adam10ΔEC mice, whereas Notch4(-/-)mice lacking endothelial Notch1 (Notch1ΔEC/Notch4(-/-)) had defects in all vascular beds affected in Adam10ΔEC mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our results argue against a major role for ADAM17 in endothelial Notch signaling and clarify the difference in phenotypes of previously described mice lacking ADAM10 or Notch in endothelial cells. Most notably, these findings uncover new roles for Notch signaling in the development of organ-specific vascular beds.
Authors: Ellen Jorissen; Johannes Prox; Christian Bernreuther; Silvio Weber; Ralf Schwanbeck; Lutgarde Serneels; An Snellinx; Katleen Craessaerts; Amantha Thathiah; Ina Tesseur; Udo Bartsch; Gisela Weskamp; Carl P Blobel; Markus Glatzel; Bart De Strooper; Paul Saftig Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Luke T Krebs; John R Shutter; Kenji Tanigaki; Tasuku Honjo; Kevin L Stark; Thomas Gridley Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Deepak A Venkatesh; Kyung-Sook Park; Anne Harrington; Laura Miceli-Libby; Jeong K Yoon; Lucy Liaw Journal: Circ Res Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Dieter Hartmann; Bart de Strooper; Lutgarde Serneels; Katleen Craessaerts; An Herreman; Wim Annaert; Lieve Umans; Torben Lübke; Anna Lena Illert; Kurt von Figura; Paul Saftig Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Tobias Brummer; Martina Pigoni; Armando Rossello; Huanhuan Wang; Peter J Noy; Michael G Tomlinson; Carl P Blobel; Stefan F Lichtenthaler Journal: FASEB J Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Gregory Farber; Matthew M Parks; Nicole Lustgarten Guahmich; Yi Zhang; Sébastien Monette; Scott C Blanchard; Annarita Di Lorenzo; Carl P Blobel Journal: Angiogenesis Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 9.596
Authors: Toshie Yoneyama; Michael Gorry; Miles A Miller; Autumn Gaither-Davis; Yan Lin; Marcia L Moss; Linda G Griffith; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Laura P Stabile; James G Herman; Nikola L Vujanovic Journal: J Cancer Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Bandana Chakravarti; Jianqi Yang; Katelin E Ahlers-Dannen; Zili Luo; Heather A Flaherty; David K Meyerholz; Mark E Anderson; Rory A Fisher Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 5.501