Literature DB >> 27354199

Rectovaginal fistula: Twenty years of rectovaginal repair.

Tsia-Shu Lo1,2,3,4, Yu-Hsin Huang5, Anil Krishna Dass6,7, Nazura Karim6,8, Ma Clarissa Uy-Patrimonio6,9.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify the favorable factors in rectovaginal fistula (RVF) management.
METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval (99-0793B), we retrospectively studied all patients diagnosed, treated and followed up with RVF at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan between January 1990 and December 2009. All female patients with International Classification of Diseases RVF were included. We reviewed demographic data, socioeconomic status, clinical presentation, comorbidities, method of treatment, duration of hospitalization and clinical outcome at 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: A total of 397 patients were included in the study. Fifty-six patients (14.1%) had conservative treatment and 341 patients (85.9%) underwent surgical intervention. A total of 125 patients underwent simple repair while 216 patients underwent reconstruction. Three hundred and forty-four patients (86.7%) had improved outcome at 12-month follow up. Age (P = 0.003), education level (P = 0.033), ability to pay insurance (P < 0.001), and choice of treatment (P < 0.0001) were identified as significant favorable factors. An etiological factor associated with favorable outcome was RVF from obstetric complication, while that resulting from malignancy had a less favorable outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Age, education level and ability to pay insurance significantly affect 12-month outcome of RVF. Surgery is the preferred option, while medical treatment should be used only for small rectovaginal fistulas or for patients not suitable for surgery and anesthesia. More support and assistance should be offered to those patients with unfavorable factors, such as old age, low education level and inability to afford insurance. All RVF secondary to obstetrical injury had a 100% favorable outcome compared with those secondary to surgery or malignancy. Women with suspected RVF should receive prompt and extensive evaluation to ensure immediate effective management and prevention of further serious complications.
© 2016 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  demographic factor; prognosis; rectovaginal fistula; surgical procedure; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27354199     DOI: 10.1111/jog.13066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  5 in total

1.  Case Report: Abdominal Cocoon With Jejuno-Ileo-Colonic Fistula.

Authors:  Jian Jiao; Keshu Shan; Kun Xiao; Zhenjun Liu; Ronghua Zhang; Kangdi Dong; Jin Liu; Qiong Teng; Liang Shang; Leping Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 2.  Rectovaginal Fistulas Secondary to Obstetrical Injury.

Authors:  Aaron J Dawes; Christine C Jensen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-09-22

3.  Surgical repair of rectovaginal fistulas: predictors of fistula closure.

Authors:  Jihong Fu; Zhonglin Liang; Yilian Zhu; Long Cui; Wei Chen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Stapled transperineal repair for low- and mid-level rectovaginal fistulas: A 5-year experience and comparison with sutured repair.

Authors:  Qian Zhou; Zhi-Min Liu; Hua-Xian Chen; Dong-Lin Ren; Hong-Cheng Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Rectovaginal fistula after low anterior resection in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hongtu Zheng; Tianan Guo; Yuchen Wu; Cong Li; Sanjun Cai; Fangqi Liu; Ye Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.