| Literature DB >> 27354088 |
Alex Whittle1, Angela V Gallego-Sala1.
Abstract
Freshwater peatlands are carbon accumulating ecosystems where primary production exceeds organic matter decomposition rates in the soil, and therefore perform an important sink function in global carbon cycling. Typical peatland plant and microbial communities are adapted to the waterlogged, often acidic and low nutrient conditions that characterise them. Peatlands in coastal locations receive inputs of oceanic base cations that shift conditions from the environmental optimum of these communities altering the carbon balance. Blanket bogs are one such type of peatlands occurring in hyperoceanic regions. Using a blanket bog to coastal marsh transect in Northwest Scotland we assess the impacts of salt intrusion on carbon accumulation rates. A threshold concentration of salt input, caused by inundation, exists corresponding to rapid acidophilic to halophilic plant community change and a carbon accumulation decline. For the first time, we map areas of blanket bog vulnerable to sea-level rise, estimating that this equates to ~7.4% of the total extent and a 0.22 Tg yr(-1) carbon sink. Globally, tropical peatlands face the proportionally greatest risk with ~61,000 km(2) (~16.6% of total) lying ≤5 m elevation. In total an estimated 20.2 ± 2.5 GtC is stored in peatlands ≤5 m above sea level, which are potentially vulnerable to inundation.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27354088 PMCID: PMC4926159 DOI: 10.1038/srep28758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Arrangement of the transect belt, and location of cores, divided into three sections based on vegetation. Section A (C1–C4: Red) inundated regularly, Section B (C5–C10: Blue), and Section C (C11–C13: Grey). Filled markers indicate cores used to calculate carbon accumulation and assess peat properties. Hollow markers indicate cores used to assess peat properties only. Spot height markers indicate elevation above sea level. (b) Location of the site at Kentra Bay and Moss, Northwest Scotland within the United Kingdom. Produced using ESRI ArcMap 10.1. (http://www.esri.com/). Contains OS data © Crown copyright (2015).
Figure 2Variables measured at the land-sea transect at Kentra Moss.
Sections A–C correspond to Fig.1 and are divided by dominant vegetation to aid interpretation. Dominant species are; Armeria maritima and Plantago spp. (Section A), Ericaceae, Eriophorum spp. and Molinia caerulea (Section B) and, Racomitrium lanuginosum and Sphagnum spp. (Section C). Vegetation type, refers to percentage surface cover of Sphagnum spp. (black), other bryophytes (dark-grey) and vascular plants (light-grey). Red triangles indicate the positions within the transect of cores analysed for carbon accumulation rate (Fig. 3).
Average (surface 30 cm) bulk density and percentage carbon for cores located along the Kentra Bay salinity gradient.
| | Bulk Density (g cm−3) | Carbon Content (%) | Total Carbon Accumulated since 1900 (gCm2) /Rate (gCm2year−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salinity gradient position and section | Mean | Standard Deviation | Mean | Standard Deviation | ||
| Inundated by salt water (tidal) | A | 0.3821 ± 0.0225 (30) | 0.1234 | 18.83 ± 2.09 (15) | 8.11 | |
| Inundated infrequently (storms) | A | 0.2934 ± 0.0225 (50) | 0.1592 | 31.02 ± 2.79 (26) | 14.25 | |
| Not Inundated-Proximal to Coast | B | 0.1274 ± 0.0028 (208) | 0.0400 | 50.46 ± 0.14(123) | 1.51 | |
| Not Inundated-Distal from Coast | C | 0.0705 ± 0.0031 (89) | 0.0292 | 50.86 ± 0.10 (52) | 0.71 | |
Values represent the mean ± SE with number of samples (bracketed). Negative values for rate of accumulation indicate net carbon sequestration from the atmosphere.
Figure 3Carbon accumulation against elevation above sea level.
Sections of variable salt input (A–C) correspond with Figs 1 and 2. Dark red indicates the maximum level of tidal inundation. Filled markers represent carbon accumulation calculated using 210Pb dating whilst hollow markers indicate results derived from Spheroidal Carbonaceous Particle dating. Error bars show uncertainty associated with sampling and dating accuracy.
Figure 4Map of global peatlands (black shading) lying at or below 5 m elevation.
Insets (A–E) show the locations of low lying blanket bog areas (red shading). Produced using ESRI ArcMap 10.2. (http://www.esri.com/).
Areas of low elevation blanket bogs and peatlands globally, with the percentage of current total extent potentially vulnerable to inundation.
| Elevation (m) | Blanket Bog | All Peatlands | Tropical | Southern | Northern | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (km2) | % Area | Area (km2) | % Area | Area (km2) | % Area | Area (km2) | % Area | Area (km2) | % Area | |
| +2 | 8,406 | 5.42 | 98,313 | 2.23 | 47,888 | 13.00 | 2,235 | 4.97 | 48,190 | 1.20 |
| +5 | 11,482 | 7.41 | 143,866 | 3.26 | 61,000 | 16.55 | 2,762 | 6.14 | 80,103 | 2.00 |
| +10 | 15,795 | 10.19 | 304,715 | 6.90 | 123,238 | 33.44 | 6,279 | 13.99 | 190,829 | 4.77 |
Sources of uncertainty associated with estimating the global extent of peatlands vulnerable to sea-level change.
| Source of uncertainty | Description |
|---|---|
| Mapping error and resolution associated with peatland extent, as well as land-surface heights may result in under or over estimation of areas at risk. | |
| Active peat accumulation (increasing land surface height) could outpace and limit the effect of sea-level rise, whilst subsidence (lowering) would amplify relative sea-level rise. A positive feedback could develop if inundation of peat caused further subsidence. | |
| Anthropogenic perturbation of healthy blanket bog functioning could complicate this balance. | |
| Peat soil has low mechanical strength to resist erosion, so loss of particulate organic carbon via direct erosion would amplify losses due to sea-level change on high-energy coasts. | |
| Enhanced salt-spray input may limit accumulation where direct contact does not occur. On low energy coastlines peat accumulation may persist. | |
| Failure of coastal management structures may result in unexpected flooding of peatland areas. | |
| Sea-level rise could increase inland water tables resulting in peatland expansion, offsetting losses by inundation elsewhere. Exposure of land on emergent coasts may allow new peatland colonisation where suitable conditions exist. | |
| High latitude landmasses have been recently deglaciated resulting in a complex pattern of global isostatic land-surface rebound. This can slow or reverse relative sea-level rise. Low-elevation peatlands in rebounding areas will be less vulnerable to inundation. | |
| Increased storminess may result in dramatic ‘one-off’ rapid erosion events of coastal peatlands. | |
| Increased salt inputs, from spray and storm surges, may input sufficient oceanic salt to peatlands changing their ecosystem functioning and carbon sink potential | |
| Salinisation of freshwater aquifers may cause ecosystem changes to peatlands even where direct inundation does not occur. | |
| Extreme (unpredictable) events leading to rapid land surface movements and subsequent salt-water inundation of peatlands, such as volcanic eruptions, landslides and earthquakes |