Literature DB >> 27353634

Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterosuperior segments or anterolateral segments: A case-matched analysis.

Woohyung Lee1, Ho-Seong Han2, Yoo-Seok Yoon1, Jai Young Cho1, YoungRok Choi1, Hong Kyung Shin1, Jae Yool Jang1, Hanlim Choi1, Jae Seong Jang1, Seong Uk Kwon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection is an attractive option for treating liver tumors. Laparoscopic liver resection is more difficult for hepatocellular carcinomas located in the posterosuperior segments than for hepatocellular carcinomas in the anterolateral segments. We compared perioperative and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinomas located in the posterosuperior and anterolateral segments.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data for 230 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinomas between September 2003 and July 2014. Of these, 116 patients were selected by case-matched analysis using age, sex, tumor number and size, Child-Pugh class, and extent of liver resection. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to tumor location: the anterolateral group (n = 58) and the posterosuperior group (n = 58).
RESULTS: Operation time (355 minutes vs 212 minutes, P < .005), intraoperative blood loss (600 mL vs 410 mL, P < .001), and hospital stay (8.5 days vs 7 days, P = .040) were significantly greater in the posterosuperior group than in the anterolateral group. The open conversion (13.8% vs 10.3%, P = .777), postoperative complication (17.2% vs 10.3%, P = .420), 5-year overall survival (88.5% vs 85.7%, P = .370), and 5-year, recurrence-free survival (47.6% vs 40.9%, P = .678) rates were not significantly different between the posterosuperior and anterolateral groups.
CONCLUSION: Although laparoscopic liver resection is more difficult for hepatocellular carcinomas located in the posterosuperior segment, there were no differences in the short- and long-term outcomes between the posterosuperior and anterolateral groups. The perceived impact of tumor location on patient outcomes could be overcome by experience and technical improvements.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27353634     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  23 in total

1.  Minimally invasive resection of posterosuperior liver tumors in the supine position using intra-abdominal trocars.

Authors:  Emin Kose; Bora Kahramangil; Husnu Aydin; Mustafa Donmez; Federico Aucejo; Cristiano Quintini; John Fung; Eren Berber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Pure Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy Using the Glissonean Approach and a Modified Liver Hanging Maneuver (Video).

Authors:  Ji Hoon Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma located in segments 7 or 8.

Authors:  Hanisah Guro; Jai Young Cho; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; YoungRok Choi; Jae Seong Jang; Seong Uk Kwon; Sungho Kim; Jang Kyu Choi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Posterior Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a High-Volume Center: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Jinsoo Rhu; Sung Joo Kim; Gyu Seong Choi; Jong Man Kim; Jae-Won Joh; Choon Hyuck David Kwon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases located in the posterosuperior liver: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Masayuki Okuno; Claire Goumard; Takashi Mizuno; Kiyohiko Omichi; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Yun Shin Chun; Thomas A Aloia; Jason B Fleming; Jeffrey E Lee; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Claudius Conrad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Systematic review of the feasibility and future of laparoscopic liver resection for difficult lesions.

Authors:  Kenichiro Araki; Norio Kubo; Akira Watanabe; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Evolution of a laparoscopic liver resection program: an analysis of 203 cases.

Authors:  Mohammed Elshamy; Hideo Takahashi; Muhammet Akyuz; Pinar Yazici; Hakan Yigitbas; Abdulrahman Y Hammad; Federico N Aucejo; Cristiano Quintini; John Fung; Eren Berber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic versus open mesohepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Wei Li; Jun Han; Guowei Xie; Yang Xiao; Ke Sun; Kefei Yuan; Hong Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for lesions located in anterolateral and posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benbo Zheng; Rongce Zhao; Xiaodong Li; Bo Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic resection for posterosuperior liver lesions: is it really superior to laparoscopic resection?

Authors:  Andrew K Y Fung; Kit-Fai Lee
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.