| Literature DB >> 27353143 |
Wen Zhang1, Xiaoyu Niu1, Liqiang Chen1, Fulong Yuan1, Yujun Zhu1.
Abstract
In this study, nano-structure ceria with three different morphologies (nanorod, nanoparticle and flake) have been prepared by hydrothermal and solvothermal methods. The ceria samples were deeply characterized by XRD, SEM, TEM, H2-TPR, XPS and in-situ DRIFTS, and tested for soot combustion in absence/presence NO atmospheres under loose and tight contact conditions. The prepared ceria samples exhibit excellent catalytic activities, especially, the CeO2 with nanorod (Ce-R) shows the best catalytic activity, for which the peak temperature of soot combustion (Tm) is about 500 and 368 °C in loose and tight contact conditions, respectively. The catalytic activity for Ce-R is higher than that of the reported CeO2 catalysts and reaches a level that of precious metals. The characterization results reveal that the maximal amounts of adsorbed oxygen species on the surface of the nanostructure Ce-R catalyst should be the crucial role to decide the catalytic soot performance. High BET surface area may also be a positive effect on soot oxidation activity under loose contact conditions.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27353143 PMCID: PMC4926248 DOI: 10.1038/srep29062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SEM images of (a) Ce-R, (b) Ce-P and (c) Ce-F.
Figure 2XRD patterns of (a) Ce-R, (b) Ce-P and (c) Ce-F.
physicochemical property of Ce-R, Ce-P and Ce-F.
| Catalyst | Lattice parameter (Å) | SBET (m2·g−1) | T1 | T2 | HT1 | HT2 | Oα1/Oβ | Ce3+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ce-R | 5.4375 | 80 | 483 | 798 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.87 | 25.1 |
| Ce-P | 5.4113 | 88 | 483 | 745 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.74 | 16.5 |
| Ce-F | 5.4164 | 62 | 497 | 768 | 0.61 | 0.39 | 0.77 | 19.1 |
aThe top temperature of the low-temperature peak.
bThe top temperature of the high-temperature peak.
cThe hydrogen consumption at 300–600 °C.
dThe hydrogen consumption at 700–900 °C.
eFrom O 1s of XPS analysis.
fFrom Ce 3d of XPS analysis.
Figure 3TEM images of (a,b) Ce-R, (c,d) Ce-P and (e,f) Ce-F.
Figure 4H2-TPR curves of (a) Ce-R, (b) Ce-P and (c) Ce-F.
Figure 5XPS of O 1s (A) and Ce 3d (B) for (a) Ce-R, (b) Ce-P and (c) Ce-F.
Figure 6In situ DRIFTS of (a) Ce-R, (b) Ce-P and (c) Ce-F (a flow of 0.5vol%CO/N2 before and after the addition of 3% O2/N2 at different temperature).
Figure 7Weight-loss profiles of soot over (a) Ce-R, (b) Ce-P and (c) Ce-F (A) under loose contact and (B) tight contact in 10vol%O2/N2.
Catalytic performances of Ce-R, Ce-P and Ce-F in 10vol%O2/N2.
| Catalyst | Contact condition | T10/oC | T50/oC | T90/oC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ce-R | Loose | 356 | 500 | 554 |
| Tight | 286 | 368 | 400 | |
| Ce-P | Loose | 413 | 521 | 573 |
| Tight | 320 | 433 | 474 | |
| Ce-F | Loose | 433 | 554 | 622 |
| Tight | 306 | 383 | 440 |
Figure 8Evolutions of NO2 concentration (A) and the TGA profile (B) for (a) Ce-R, (b) Ce-P and (c) Ce-F mixed with soot under the tight contact condition in 1000 ppm NO and 10vol%O2/N2.
Catalytic performances of Ce-R, Ce-P and Ce-F in 1000 ppm NO and 10vol%O2/N2 under tight contact conditions.
| Ce-R | 360 | 275 | 315 | 347 |
| Ce-P | 399 | 301 | 357 | 398 |
| Ce-F | 379 | 296 | 337 | 372 |