Literature DB >> 2735304

Temporomandibular joint inflammation: comparison of MR fast scanning with T1- and T2-weighted imaging techniques.

K P Schellhas1, C H Wilkes.   

Abstract

One hundred painful temporomandibular joints in 100 patients were studied with high-field, surface-coil MR imaging. Partial flip angle or GRASS (gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state) and either T1-weighted or spin-echo long TR/short-long TE imaging techniques were used to assess the relative sensitivity and accuracy of these techniques in detecting joint fluid. Intraarticular fluid, interpreted to represent joint effusion, was observed in 88 of the 100 painful joints scanned. GRASS scans were obtained with the mouth closed, partially opened, and fully opened; T1-weighted and spin-echo images were obtained only with the mouth closed. Long TR/long TE spin-echo images were the most sensitive to fluid detection within the joint spaces. GRASS images were highly sensitive to intraarticular fluid, although the thicker scan section and local artifacts associated with these techniques resulted in lower accuracy compared with the spin-echo long TR/long TE images. Joint fluid was directly observed in many of the 28 joints operated on from the series, and two of two joints were successfully aspirated. Osteochondritis dissecans and avascular necrosis are best demonstrated and staged with a combination of short TR/short TE and long TR/long TE weighted images, although a spin-echo long TR/short and long TE pulse sequence is more practical for this purpose. We recommend long TR/short and long TE spin-echo closed-mouth sagittal images combined with GRASS closed- and open-mouth views whenever inflammatory temporomandibular joint disease is suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2735304     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.153.1.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Visualization of the articular disk of the temporomandibular joint in near-real-time MRI: feasibility study.

Authors:  Nasreddin D Abolmaali; Jan Schmitt; Wolfram Schwarz; Douglas E Toll; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Differences in signal intensities of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effusion on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images.

Authors:  Mika Otonari-Yamamoto; Kenichi Imoto
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Disc displacement and changes in condylar position.

Authors:  K Ikeda; A Kawamura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Imaging of the temporomandibular joint: An update.

Authors:  Asim K Bag; Santhosh Gaddikeri; Aparna Singhal; Simms Hardin; Benson D Tran; Josue A Medina; Joel K Curé
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

5.  The development of strains, forces and nociceptor activity in retrodiscal tissues of the temporomandibular joint of male and female goats.

Authors:  B Loughner; J Miller; V Broumand; B Cooper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Relationship between anterior disc displacement with/without reduction and effusion in temporomandibular disorder patients using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kwang-Joon Koh; Ha-Na Park; Kyoung-A Kim
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-12-12

7.  Assessment of bone marrow fat fractions in the mandibular condyle head using the iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL-IQ) method.

Authors:  Kug Jin Jeon; Chena Lee; Yoon Joo Choi; Sang-Sun Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Novel vertebral computed tomography indices in normal and spinal disorder dogs.

Authors:  Jongsu Lim; Youngmin Yoon; Taesung Hwang; Hee Chun Lee
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 1.672

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.