Literature DB >> 27352633

Prilocaine spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery: A review of the available studies.

Jan Boublik1, Ruchir Gupta2, Supurna Bhar3, Arthur Atchabahian4.   

Abstract

Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) led to the abandonment of intrathecal lidocaine. We reviewed the published literature for information about the duration of action and side effects of intrathecal prilocaine, which has been recently reintroduced in Europe. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for the time period from 1966 to 2015. Fourteen prospective and one retrospective study were retrieved. The duration of the surgical block can be adjusted using doses between 40 and 80mg. Hyperbaric prilocaine in doses as low as 10mg can be used for perianal procedures. Four cases of TNS in 486 patients were reported in prospective studies, and none in 5000 cases in a retrospective data set. Spinal prilocaine appears to be safe and reliable for day case anesthesia. However, as chloroprocaine has a shorter duration and a lower risk of TNS and urinary retention, the indications for prilocaine remain to be defined.
Copyright © 2016 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory surgery; Intrathecal; Prilocaine; Spinal; Transient neurological syndrome; Urinary retention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27352633     DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med        ISSN: 2352-5568            Impact factor:   4.132


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of 0.375% ropivacaine psoas compartment block and 2% prilocaine spinal anaesthesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy.

Authors:  Diego Sarotti; Elena Lardone; Lisa Piras; Davide Mancusi; Paolo Franci
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Retrospective analysis of mepivacaine, prilocaine and chloroprocaine for low-dose spinal anaesthesia in outpatient perianal procedures.

Authors:  Volker Gebhardt; Kevin Kiefer; Dieter Bussen; Christel Weiss; Marc D Schmittner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Non-Doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation and hemorrhoidopexy combined with pudendal nerve block for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Michail Spyridakis; Elias Zintzaras; Eleni Arnaoutoglou; Manousos-Georgios Pramateftakis; Konstantinos Tepetes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Alleviation of prilocaine-induced epileptiform activity and cardiotoxicity by thymoquinone.

Authors:  Barış Akgül; İlker Öngüç Aycan; Enis Hidişoğlu; Ebru Afşar; Sendegül Yıldırım; Gamze Tanrıöver; Nesil Coşkunfırat; Suat Sanlı; Mutay Aslan
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as local anesthetic adjuvants in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  ShuJun Sun; JiaMei Wang; NaRen Bao; Ying Chen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Tailored Surgery in Inguinal Hernia Repair. The Role of Subarachnoid Anesthesia: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Piergaspare Palumbo; Sofia Usai; Chiara Amatucci; Saverio Cerasari; Bruno Perotti; Luca Ruggeri; Roberto Cirocchi; Guglielmo Tellan
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-10-29

7.  Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Xavier Capdevila; Christophe Aveline; Laurent Delaunay; Hervé Bouaziz; Paul Zetlaoui; Olivier Choquet; Laurent Jouffroy; Hélène Herman-Demars; Francis Bonnet
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Determination of the ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine with sufentanil for scheduled cesarean delivery: a dose-finding study based on the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  P Goffard; Y Vercruysse; R Leloup; J-F Fils; S Chevret; Y Kapessidou
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.217

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.