Literature DB >> 27352558

The problems of cervical conization for postmenopausal patients.

K Hasegawa, Y Torii, R Kato, Y Udagawa, I Fukasawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cervical conization is the definitive treatment for women of any age who have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). However, complications of the procedure have not been fully investigated in postmenopausal patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results and complications of cervical conization performed on premenopausal and postmenopausal patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study recruited 405 patients who had undergone cervical laser conization. The median age was 36 years (range 20 to 75), and there were 361 (89.1%) premenopausal and 44 (10.9%) postmenopausal women.
RESULTS: The length of the cone removed from the postmenopausal patients was significantly longer than the length from the premenopausal patients (17.9 ± 3.9 mm vs. 15.7 ± 3.6 mm, respectively; p = 0.02). The rate of positive endocervical cone margins from the premenopausal patients was significantly higher than the rate from the postmenopausal patients (9.1% vs. 0%, respectively; p = 0.037). The rate of cervical stenosis was significantly higher in postmenopausal patients than in premenopausal patients (59.1% vs. 8.3%; respectively; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the rates of frequency of intraoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Although deep incision is mandatory for complete excision of CIN in postmenopausal patients, it increases the incidence of cervical stenosis. Cervical conization may be a less invasive surgical procedure for older women with CIN than hysterectomy; however, the risk of postoperative complications remains, causing a dilemma for physicians treating postmenopausal women with CIN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27352558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol        ISSN: 0392-2936            Impact factor:   0.196


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of pathological and clinical characteristics of cervical conization according to age group in Japan.

Authors:  Isao Murakami; Akiko Ohno; Masae Ikeda; Hiroshi Yamashita; Mikio Mikami; Yoichi Kobayashi; Satoru Nagase; Masatoshi Yokoyama; Takayuki Enomoto; Hidetaka Katabuchi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-10-08

2.  Clinical Outcomes Associated with Endocervical Glandular Involvement in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia III.

Authors:  Nae Ry Kim; Zee Hae Baek; A Jin Lee; Eun Jung Yang; Yung-Taek Ouh; Mi Kyung Kim; Seung-Hyuk Shim; Sun Joo Lee; Tae Jin Kim; Kyeong A So
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Meihua Liu; Yurou Ji; Pengpeng Qu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of a cold knife and an electric knife for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Weifeng Zhang; Yi Lin
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.573

5.  Histopathological findings in hysterectomy for cervical stenosis in postmenopausal women: A retrospective case series.

Authors:  Francesco Sopracordevole; Nicolò Clemente; Maria Papiccio; Anna Del Fabro; Matteo Serri; Mariasole Fichera; Monica Buttignol; Giorgio Giorda; Giovanni Delli Carpini; Andrea Ciavattini
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Lei Li; Yalan Bi; Huanwen Wu; Ming Wu; Jinghe Lang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.