Literature DB >> 27352073

Long-term results after treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP).

E Crespo1,2, S Gómez3, V Palacios3, J Galvez3, J M Tenías3, I Cano3, R Peñuela3, A Arcas3, R Crespo3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the long-term osteosynthesis results for AO/OTA 31.A1-A2 pertrochanteric fractures treated with the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This investigation was a retrospective observational descriptive study of 335 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years and a maximum follow-up of 8 years (2004-2011).
RESULTS: The average post-operative hospital stay was 6.2 days, and the average decrease in haemoglobin levels after the intervention was 2.7 mg/dL, with transfusion required for one-third of the patients. Complications related to the implant were observed in 4.2 % of patients; the most notable complication was cut-out (2.4 % of patients), and 3 cases involved pseudarthrosis with breakage of the implant (0.9 % of patients).
CONCLUSIONS: From the results obtained in this study and an analysis of previously published work, we believe that the PCCP may be the implant of choice for AO/OTA 31.A1-A2 fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip fractures; Percutaneous compression plate; Pertrochanteric femoral fractures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27352073     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-016-1805-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  16 in total

1.  The percutaneous compression plate versus the dynamic hip screw: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sukhmeet Singh Panesar; Saqeb Mirza; Gaurav Bharadwaj; Victor Woolf; Ratukondla Ravikumar; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  Provider factors associated with intramedullary nail use for intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Mary L Forte; Beth A Virnig; Lynn E Eberly; Marc F Swiontkowski; Roger Feldman; Mohit Bhandari; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The Gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  S C Halder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

4.  The Gotfried percutaneous compression plate compared with the conventional classic hip screw for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  K P Kosygan; R Mohan; R J Newman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-01

5.  Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Anglen; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of the percutaneous compression plating system for hip fractures.

Authors:  Yechiel Gotfried; Boaz Cohen; Assa Rotem
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 7.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Authors:  Martyn J Parker; Helen H G Handoll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

Review 8.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Authors:  Martyn J Parker; Helen Hg Handoll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08

9.  Percutaneous compression plate versus dynamic hip screw for treatment of intertrochanteric Hip fractures: a meta-analyse of five randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Jie Shen; Shengpeng Yu; Qiang Huang; Zhao Xie
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-10

10.  Percutaneous compression plate versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treating elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Qingshan Guo; Yue Shen; Zhaowen Zong; Yufeng Zhao; Huayu Liu; Xiang Hua; Hui Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 1.601

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.