Literature DB >> 27352010

Clinical Utility of the Difficulty Scoring System for Predicting Surgical Time of Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

Hiroki Uchida1, Yukio Iwashita1, Kunihiro Saga1, Hiroomi Takayama1, Kiminori Watanabe1, Yuichi Endo1, Kazuhiro Yada1, Masayuki Ohta1, Masafumi Inomata1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has several problems, such as technical complexity and patient and tumor factors. A difficulty scoring system to preoperatively evaluate the difficulty of LLR was established at the second International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical usefulness of the difficulty scoring system for LLR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2010 to June 2015, the records of 78 patients who had undergone LLR were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' data were used to assign a difficulty score, and the correlations between scores and surgical outcomes were investigated.
RESULTS: The mean surgical time was 256 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 168 mL. The difficulty score significantly correlated with surgical time and blood loss, but not with morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. Multivariate analysis showed that the difficulty score was an independent predictor of prolonged surgical time.
CONCLUSIONS: The difficulty score was found to be an effective predictor of surgical time for LLR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27352010     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

1.  Critical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Patrick Pessaux; Kaitlyn A Beyfuss; Shiva Jayaraman; Pablo E Serrano; Guillaume Martel; Natalie G Coburn; Tullio Piardi; Alyson L Mahar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Score-a Validation Study.

Authors:  Ser Yee Lee; Brian K P Goh; Gholami Sepideh; John C Allen; Ryan P Merkow; Jin Yao Teo; Deepa Chandra; Ye Xin Koh; Ek Khoon Tan; Juinn Haur Kam; Peng Chung Cheow; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Chung Yip Chan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system.

Authors:  Charing C N Chong; H T Lok; Andrew K Y Fung; Anthony K W Fong; Y S Cheung; John Wong; K F Lee; Paul B S Lai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system.

Authors:  Hiroki Uchida; Yukio Iwashita; Kazuhiro Tada; Kunihiro Saga; Hiroomi Takayama; Teijiro Hirashita; Yuichi Endo; Masayuki Ohta; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Arpad Ivanecz; Irena Plahuta; Tomislav Magdalenić; Matej Mencinger; Iztok Peruš; Stojan Potrč; Bojan Krebs
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Current topics in the surgical treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Daisuke Ban; Toshiro Ogura; Keiichi Akahoshi; Minoru Tanabe
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.