Literature DB >> 27351690

Listening is therapy: Patient interviewing from a pain science perspective.

Ina Diener1, Mark Kargela2, Adriaan Louw3.   

Abstract

The interview of a patient attending physical therapy is the cornerstone of the physical examination, diagnosis, plan of care, prognosis, and overall efficacy of the therapeutic experience. A thorough, skilled interview drives the objective tests and measures chosen, as well as provides context for the interpretation of those tests and measures, during the physical examination. Information from the interview powerfully influences the treatment modalities chosen by the physical therapist (PT) and thus also impacts the overall outcome and prognosis of the therapy sessions. Traditional physical therapy focuses heavily on biomedical information to educate people about their pain, and this predominant model focusing on anatomy, biomechanics, and pathoanatomy permeates the interview and physical examination. Although this model may have a significant effect on people with acute, sub-acute or postoperative pain, this type of examination may not only gather insufficient information regarding the pain experience and suffering, but negatively impact a patient's pain experience. In recent years, physical therapy treatment for pain has increasingly focused on pain science education, with increasing evidence of pain science education positively affecting pain, disability, pain catastrophization, movement limitations, and overall healthcare cost. In line with the ever-increasing focus of pain science in physical therapy, it is time for the examination, both subjective and objective, to embrace a biopsychosocial approach beyond the realm of only a biomedical approach. A patient interview is far more than "just" collecting information. It also is a critical component to establishing an alliance with a patient and a fundamental first step in therapeutic neuroscience education (TNE) for patients in pain. This article highlights the interview process focusing on a pain science perspective as it relates to screening patients, establishing psychosocial barriers to improvement, and pain mechanism assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interview; neuroscience; pain; pain education; physical therapy; therapeutic relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27351690     DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1194648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract        ISSN: 0959-3985            Impact factor:   2.279


  6 in total

1.  Immediate effect of pain neuroscience education for recent onset low back pain: an exploratory single arm trial.

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Kevin Farrell; Breanna Choffin; Brooke Foster; Grace Lunde; Michelle Snodgrass; Robert Sweet; Matthew Weitzel; Rebecca Wilder; Emilio J Puentedura
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-06-04

2.  Evaluation is treatment for low back pain.

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Steve Goldrick; Andrew Bernstetter; Leonard H Van Gelder; Aaron Parr; Kory Zimney; Terry Cox
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2020-02-24

3.  Pain neuroscience education: Which pain neuroscience education metaphor worked best?

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Emilio J Puentedura; Ina Diener; Kory J Zimney; Terry Cox
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2019-08-13

4.  Patients' Views on the Implementation Potential of a Stratified Treatment Approach for Low Back Pain in Germany: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sven Karstens; Sarah Lang; Benjamin Saunders
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2020-12-07

5.  Physiotherapy support for self-management of persisting musculoskeletal pain disorders.

Authors:  Ina Diener
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2021-10-29

Review 6.  Factors That Foster Therapeutic Alliance in Pediatric Sports and Orthopedics: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel N Meyers; Robyn B McHugh; Alissa M Conde
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.