Literature DB >> 27351098

The Impact of Underweight Status on the Prognosis of Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Vasilios Pergialiotis1, Stergios K Doumouchtsis2, Despina Perrea1, Georgios D Vlachos3.   

Abstract

Malnutrition and underweight status pose an unfavorable prognosis for cancer patients. Several studies have addressed the impact of a low body mass index (BMI) (<18.5 kg/m(2)) on ovarian cancer progression. However, their results seem to be conflicting. The present meta-analysis investigates whether the underweight status negatively affects the progress of ovarian cancer. We conducted a systematic review searching the Medline (1966-2014), Scopus (2004-2014), Popline (1974-2014), ClinicalTrials.gov (2008-2014), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (1999-2014) databases together with reference lists from included studies. All prospective and retrospective observational cohort studies were included. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software. Current evidence suggests that the stage of the disease does not differ between underweight and normal-weight patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-1.39 for stage I; OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.71-2.27 for stage II; OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71-1.51 for stage III; and OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.63-1.76 for stage IV disease]. Concurrently, the risk of residual disease after surgery (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.69-1.52) and the risk of dying due to ovarian cancer (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.64-1.85) seem to be similar. According to the findings of our systematic review, the underweight status does not seem to have a detrimental impact on ovarian cancer prognosis. However, the methodological limitations of published studies and the small number of enrolled underweight patients preclude firm results. Thus, future research in this field is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27351098     DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1190021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Cancer        ISSN: 0163-5581            Impact factor:   2.900


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of the Combination of CEA and Fibrinogen/Albumin Ratio in Resectable Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Junbin Zhang; Jiayin Ruan; Weibin Wang; Yimin Lu; Haiyong Wang; Xiongfei Yu; Haohao Wang; Lisong Teng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Comment on "Association of obesity with illness severity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study".

Authors:  Qunying Yang; Xiaofei Li
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 3.  Association between Energy Balance-Related Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Stelten; Christelle Schofield; Yvonne A W Hartman; Pedro Lopez; Gemma G Kenter; Robert U Newton; Daniel A Galvão; Meeke Hoedjes; Dennis R Taaffe; Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen; Carolyn McIntyre; Laurien M Buffart
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  What is the impact of underweight on self-reported health trajectories and mortality rates: a cohort study.

Authors:  Geir Fagerjord Lorem; Henrik Schirmer; Nina Emaus
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.186

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.