D G Davila1, N Parikh2, M J Frelich1, M I Goldblatt3. 1. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. 2. Department of Economic Studies, Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA. 3. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. mgoldbla@mcw.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Over 300,000 ventral hernia repairs (VHRs) are performed each year in the US. We sought to assess the economic burden related to ventral hernia recurrences with a focused comparison of those with the initial open versus laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: The Premier Alliance database from 2009 to 2014 was utilized to obtain patient demographics and comorbid indices, including the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Total hospital cost and resource expenses during index laparoscopic and open VHRs and subsequent recurrent repairs were also obtained. The sample was separated into laparoscopic and open repair groups from the initial operation. Adjusted and propensity score matched cost outcome data were then compared amongst groups. RESULTS: One thousand and seventy-seven patients were used for the analysis with a recurrence rate of 3.78 %. For the combined sample, costs were significantly higher during recurrent hernia repair hospitalization ($21,726 versus $19,484, p < 0.0001). However, for index laparoscopic repairs, both the adjusted total hospital cost and department level costs were similar during the index and the recurrent visit. The costs and resource utilization did not go up due to recurrence, even though these patients had greater severity during the recurrent visit (CCI score 0.92 versus 1.06; p = 0.0092). Using a matched sample, the total hospital recurrence cost was higher for the initial open group compared to laparoscopic group ($14,520 versus $12,649; p = 0.0454). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analysis, need for recurrent VHR adds substantially to total hospital costs and resource utilization. Following initial laparoscopic repair, however, the total cost of recurrent repair is not significantly increased, as it is following initial open repair. When comparing the initial laparoscopic repair versus open, the cost of recurrence was higher for the prior open repair group.
PURPOSE: Over 300,000 ventral hernia repairs (VHRs) are performed each year in the US. We sought to assess the economic burden related to ventral hernia recurrences with a focused comparison of those with the initial open versus laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: The Premier Alliance database from 2009 to 2014 was utilized to obtain patient demographics and comorbid indices, including the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Total hospital cost and resource expenses during index laparoscopic and open VHRs and subsequent recurrent repairs were also obtained. The sample was separated into laparoscopic and open repair groups from the initial operation. Adjusted and propensity score matched cost outcome data were then compared amongst groups. RESULTS: One thousand and seventy-seven patients were used for the analysis with a recurrence rate of 3.78 %. For the combined sample, costs were significantly higher during recurrent hernia repair hospitalization ($21,726 versus $19,484, p < 0.0001). However, for index laparoscopic repairs, both the adjusted total hospital cost and department level costs were similar during the index and the recurrent visit. The costs and resource utilization did not go up due to recurrence, even though these patients had greater severity during the recurrent visit (CCI score 0.92 versus 1.06; p = 0.0092). Using a matched sample, the total hospital recurrence cost was higher for the initial open group compared to laparoscopic group ($14,520 versus $12,649; p = 0.0454). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analysis, need for recurrent VHR adds substantially to total hospital costs and resource utilization. Following initial laparoscopic repair, however, the total cost of recurrent repair is not significantly increased, as it is following initial open repair. When comparing the initial laparoscopic repair versus open, the cost of recurrence was higher for the prior open repair group.
Authors: Paul D Colavita; Victor B Tsirline; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; Igor Belyansky; B Todd Heniford Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Rosa Fernández Lobato; Juan Carlos Ruiz de Adana Belbel; Francisco Angulo Morales; Javier García Septiem; Francisco Javier Marín Lucas; Manuel Limones Esteban Journal: Cir Esp Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 1.653
Authors: Brett L Ecker; Lindsay E Y Kuo; Kristina D Simmons; John P Fischer; Jon B Morris; Rachel R Kelz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Paul D Colavita; Amanda L Walters; Victor B Tsirline; Igor Belyansky; Amy E Lincourt; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; B Todd Heniford Journal: Am Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Meik Friedrich; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Stephanie Roll; Werner Kulp; Christoph Vauth; Wolfgang Greiner; Stefan Willich; Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg Journal: GMS Health Technol Assess Date: 2008-03-07
Authors: C E Hutchison; I A Rhemtulla; J T Mauch; R B Broach; F A Enriquez; J A Hernandez; C A Messa; N N Williams; S P Harbison; J P Fischer Journal: Hernia Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: K A Schlosser; A M Kao; Y Zhang; T Prasad; K R Kasten; B R Davis; B T Heniford; P D Colavita Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: H Hoffmann; F Köckerling; D Adolf; F Mayer; D Weyhe; W Reinpold; R Fortelny; P Kirchhoff Journal: Hernia Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Omar Elfanagely; Sammy Othman; Jonathan A Sanchez; Arturo Rios-Diaz; Joseph A Mellia; John P Fischer Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 2.417
Authors: David K Halpern; Raelina S Howell; Harika Boinpally; Cristina Magadan-Alvarez; Patrizio Petrone; Collin E M Brathwaite Journal: JSLS Date: 2019 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.172