Literature DB >> 27349412

Comparison of Vacuum and Aspiration on Phacoemulsification Efficiency and Chatter Using a Monitored Forced Infusion System.

Dallas S Shi1, Jason D Jensen1, Gregory D Kramer1, Brian Zaugg1, Brian C Stagg1, Jeff H Pettey1, William R Barlow1, Randall J Olson2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of vacuum and aspiration rates on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter using a monitored forced infusion system.
DESIGN: In vitro animal study.
SETTING: John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. PROCEDURES: Formalin-soaked porcine lenses were divided into 2 mm cubes (tip diameter, 0.9 mm). Vacuum levels were tested at 200, 300, 400, and 500 mm Hg; aspiration rates at 20, 35, and 50 mL/min. Torsional power was set at 60% and intraocular pressure at 50 mm Hg.
RESULTS: Increasing vacuum increased efficiency regardless of aspiration rates (R(2) = 0.92; P = .0004). Increasing aspiration further increased efficiency when vacuum was at 400 and 500 mm Hg (P = .004 for 20 vs 35 mL/min, P = .0008 for 35 vs 50 mL/min). At 200 and 300 mm Hg, efficiency only improved when increasing aspiration to 35 mL/min (P < .0001 with 20 vs 35 + 50 mL/min). Chatter improved with increasing vacuum, up to 400 mm Hg (P = .003 for 200 vs 300 mm Hg and P = .045 for 300 vs 500 mm Hg). A similar trend of improved chatter was seen with increasing levels of aspiration.
CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum improved efficiency up to 500 mm Hg independent of flow. Flow has an additive effect on efficiency through 50 mL/min, when vacuum is at 400 mm Hg or higher, and only up to 35 mL/min at vacuums less than 400 mm Hg. Chatter correlated with both vacuum and flow such that increasing either parameter decreases chatter, up to 400 mm Hg with vacuum.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27349412     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  5 in total

1.  The effect of increasing power when grooving using phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Rhett S Thomson; Brian A Bird; Lance A Stutz; Joshua B Heczko; Ashlie A Bernhisel; William R Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-12

2.  Optimization of the Oertli CataRhex 3® phacoemulsification machine.

Authors:  Lance A Stutz; Joshua B Heczko; Brian A Bird; Rhett S Thomson; Ashlie A Bernhisel; William R Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-16

3.  Optimizing Tip Diameter in Phacoemulsification of Varying Lens Sizes: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Aniket Ramshekar; Joshua Heczko; Ashlie Bernhisel; William Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall Olson; Jeff Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-17

4.  Optimization of Phacoemulsification Tip Gauge on the Oertli CataRhex3 in an in vitro Setting.

Authors:  John S Peterson; Michael R Christensen; Caitlynn Cooper; Christina Mamalis; Ashlie A Bernhisel; Brian Zaugg; William R Barlow; Emilie Ungricht; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-08

5.  Comparative anatomical outcomes of high-flow vs. low-flow phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Po-Chin Kuo; Jia-Horung Hung; Yu-Chen Su; Ching-Ju Fang; Chaw-Ning Lee; Yi-Hsun Huang; Shih-Chieh Shao; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.