Literature DB >> 27349154

Differential effects of primary motor cortex and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study.

F Ehsani1, A H Bakhtiary2, S Jaberzadeh3, A Talimkhani4, A Hajihasani5.   

Abstract

The purpose of study was to compare the effect of primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) on online and offline motor learning in healthy individuals. Fifty-nine healthy volunteers were randomly divided into three groups (n=20 in two experimental groups and n=19 in sham-control group). One experimental group received M1a-tDCSand another received cerebellar a-tDCS. The main outcome measure were response time (RT) and number of errors during serial response time test (SRTT) which were assessed prior, 35min and 48h after the interventions. Reduction of response time (RT) and error numbers at last block of the test compared to the first block was considered online learning. Comparison of assessments during retention tests was considered as short-term and long-term offline learning. Online RT reduction was not different among groups (P>0.05), while online error reduction was significantly greater in cerebellar a-tDCS than sham-control group (P<0.017). Moreover, a-tDCS on both M1 and cerebellar regions produced more long-term offline learning as compared to sham tDCS (P<0.01), while short-term offline RT reduction was significantly greater in M1a-tDCS than sham-control group (P<0.05). The findings indicated that although cerebellar a-tDCS enhances online learning and M1a-tDCS has more effect on short-term offline learning, both M1 and cerebellar a-tDCS can be used as a boosting technique for improvement of offline motor learning in healthy individuals. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellum; Motor learning; Primary motor cortex; Serial reaction time test; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27349154     DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2016.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  19 in total

1.  Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Angela Voegtle; Clara Terlutter; Katharina Nikolai; Amr Farahat; Hermann Hinrichs; Catherine M Sweeney-Reed
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 2.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: a Promising Approach for Stroke Recovery?

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Does M1 anodal transcranial direct current stimulation affects online and offline motor learning in patients with multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  Nooshin Masoudian; Fatemeh Ehsani; Monireh Nazari; Maryam Zoghi; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Modulating Motor Learning through Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation: An Integrative View.

Authors:  Claudia Ammann; Danny Spampinato; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-23

5.  Cerebellar degeneration affects cortico-cortical connectivity in motor learning networks.

Authors:  Elinor Tzvi; Christoph Zimmermann; Richard Bey; Thomas F Münte; Matthias Nitschke; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 6.  Targeting the Human Cerebellum with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Modulate Behavior: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Viola Oldrati; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Immediate effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with functional electrical stimulation on activity of the tibialis anterior muscle and balance of individuals with hemiparesis stemming from a stroke.

Authors:  Aline Marina Alves Fruhauf; Fabiano Politti; Simone Dal Corso; Gláucio Carneiro Costa; Amanda da Conceição Teodósio; Soraia Micaela Silva; João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa; Fernanda Ishida Corrêa
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-12-07

8.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nitika Kumari; Denise Taylor; Usman Rashid; Alain C Vandal; Paul F Smith; Nada Signal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Differential Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Depending on Previous Musical Training.

Authors:  Ana Sánchez-Kuhn; Cristian Pérez-Fernández; Margarita Moreno; Pilar Flores; Fernando Sánchez-Santed
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-10

10.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation With Gamma Oscillations Over the Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellar Hemisphere Improved Visuomotor Performance.

Authors:  Shota Miyaguchi; Naofumi Otsuru; Sho Kojima; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Mitsuhiro Masaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.