Literature DB >> 27348845

Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Peri-Implant Pathology in Systemic Compromised Patients.

Joana Neves1,2, Miguel de Araújo Nobre3, Pedro Oliveira1, José Martins Dos Santos1, Paulo Malo4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the possible risk factors for implant failure and peri-implant pathology in a population of systemically compromised patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective clinical study included a total of 721 systemically compromised patients (422 women, 299 men), with an average age of 51 years (range: 20 to 87) rehabilitated with dental implants. The average follow-up time was 7.3 years. The patients' demographic variables (age and gender) and clinical variables (implant location, type of implant surface, and systemic conditions) were recorded. Outcome measures were implant failure and peri-implant pathology. Binary logistic regression models were performed to investigate the effect of the patients' demographic and clinical characteristics on the dependent variables implant failure and peri-implant pathology. A linear regression model was performed to correlate the patient's characteristics with the number of failed implants. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals and corresponding levels of significance were estimated for each variable.
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression disclosed increased age (patients over 40 years of age) as a risk factor for implant failure (OR = 2.63) and hepatitis as a risk factor for peri-implant pathology (OR = 3.74). Multivariate linear regression disclosed rheumatologic and cardiac diseases to be correlated with a higher number of failed implants.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest no absolute contraindications for implant rehabilitation in a population of systemically compromised patients. Nevertheless, this study suggests that increasing age, rheumatological condition, cardiovascular condition, and hepatitis should be considered when performing implant-supported rehabilitations due to their negative influence on the outcome.
© 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implant; implant failure; peri-implant pathology; risk factor; systemic disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27348845     DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  6 in total

1.  Enhancing osseointegration of titanium implants through large-grit sandblasting combined with micro-arc oxidation surface modification.

Authors:  Wulin He; Xing Yin; Li Xie; Zeping Liu; Jingtao Li; Shujuan Zou; Jianwei Chen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  [Oral implant treatment for elderly patients].

Authors:  Quan Yuan
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-01

3.  Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients.

Authors:  Anuj Singh Parihar; Sudha Madhuri; Raghu Devanna; Geeta Sharma; Rohit Singh; Kaushik Shetty
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

4.  THE EFFECT OF LOCAL AND SYSTEMIC FACTORS ON DENTAL IMPLANT FAILURE - ANALYSIS OF 670 PATIENTS WITH 1260 IMPLANTS.

Authors:  Željko Rotim; Ivica Pelivan; Ivan Sabol; Mato Sušić; Amir Ćatić; Andrija Petar Bošnjak
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 0.780

5.  TiO2 Nanotubes Alleviate Diabetes-Induced Osteogenetic Inhibition.

Authors:  Jinghong Yang; Hui Zhang; Sin Man Chan; Ruoqi Li; Yu Wu; Min Cai; Anxun Wang; Yan Wang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-05-18

Review 6.  Smoking and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abir Dunia Mustapha; Zainab Salame; Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.