Literature DB >> 27348609

Moving from rational to normative ideologies of control over public involvement: A case of continued managerial dominance.

Charlotte Croft1, Graeme Currie2, Sophie Staniszewska3.   

Abstract

Public Involvement (PI) is a strategic priority in global healthcare settings, yet can be seen as peripheral during decision making processes. Whilst extant research acknowledges variations in how policy is translated into practice, the majority attribute it to the limiting influence of professional hierarchies on the perceived 'legitimacy' of PI. Drawing on examples of three commissioning organisations within the English NHS, we outline how the variance in policy implementation for PI can be attributed to influence from the managers rather than professionals. In doing so we explore how rational ideologies of managerial control negatively impact PI. However, we also illustrate how PI alluded to in policy can be more successfully realised when organisational managers enact normative ideologies of control. Notwithstanding this assertion, we argue managerial domination exists even in the case of normative ideologies of control, to the detriment of more radical PI in service development.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Commissioning; England NHS; Managers; Policy implementation; Public involvement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27348609     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  3 in total

1.  Patient and public involvement in priority-setting decisions in England's Transforming NHS: An interview study with Clinical Commissioning Groups in South London sustainability transformation partnerships.

Authors:  Clare Coultas; Katharina Kieslich; Peter Littlejohns
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Patient and public involvement facilitators: Could they be the key to the NHS quality improvement agenda?

Authors:  Sarah Todd; Christine Coupland; Raymond Randall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space.

Authors:  Rachel Matthews; Constantina Stan Papoulias
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2019-04-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.